In message <1143576247....@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
"ira...@gmail.com" <ira...@gmail.com> writes:
>This group of people regularly educates the Google users on proper
>netiquette. The education comes in a variety of forms, from a
>sarcastic question to a polite and straightforward request.
>
>I guess my point is that netiquette is dynamic, not static. When I see
>people complaining about lack of context for posts, instead of berating
>the poster, perhaps the reader is the one who should consider change?
Google tell you it's good netiquette to summarise postings when using
Google Groups!
http://groups.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=12348&query=quote&
topic=0&type=f
What's good 'netiquette' when posting to Usenet?
The Do's and Don'ts of Posting on Google Groups
[...]
Summarize what you're following up.
When you click "Reply" under "show options" to follow up an
existing article, Google Groups includes the full article in
quotes, with the cursor at the top of the article. Tempting
though it is to just start typing your message, please STOP and
do two things first. Look at the quoted text and remove parts
that are irrelevant. Then, go to the BOTTOM of the article and
start typing there. Doing this makes it much easier for your
readers to get through your post. They'll have a reminder of the
relevant text before your comment, but won't have to re-read the
entire article. And if your reply appears on a site before the
original article does, they'll get the gist of what you're
talking about.
Why do people using Google Groups know more about how to use it than
Google do themselves?
Also consider that some people - such as LSJ - have to read a LOT of
posts, particularly when they go away for a few days and have to come
back. The Google Groups interface is horrendously bad for reading lots
of posts compared to a proper news-reader, which makes following things
much more hard work. So why should they have to put in more effort
because other people can't be bothered to spend the three extra seconds
it takes to quote a post and delete the irrelevant portions?
Also, however, many people posting context-less Google Groups posts
operate under the shared delusion that you can just click on the
previous post and find out what the context was. This is wrong.
Completely wrong. Google make it pretty easy for anyone to have their
posts excluded from the archive, and plenty of people take advantage of
this. What use is the one line response "Yes, that's right" when the
original question isn't there anymore? Hey, I know, if the question had
been quoted so that we had context, nothing can go wrong! Now there's a
thought.
Posting contextless posts is just plain dumb. It ignores what Google
ask people to do. It makes getting answers to your posts harder. And
it doesn't work like people have apparently convinced themselves it
does. Why change to a demonstrably less helpful, less useful system?
--
James Coupe
PGP Key: 0x5D623D5D YOU ARE IN ERROR.
EBD690ECD7A1FB457CA2 NO-ONE IS SCREAMING.
13D7E668C3695D623D5D THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION.