rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

Summon the Serpent

5 messages from 4 participants · 24 March 1998 – 25 March 1998
original thread on Google Groups

Bryant Durrell

OK, I'm sure I'm just being without clue, here, but -- Summon the Serpent has some plain card text (very straightforward) and some bold card text. But it's not a Discipline card, it just requires a Follower of Set to play. So when does the bold text kick in? -- Bryant Durrell [] dur...@innocence.com [] http://www.innocence.com/~durrell [----------------------------------------------------------------------------] "Life is a great big canvas, and you should throw all the paint on it you can." -- Danny Kaye

LSJ

Bryant Durrell wrote: > > OK, I'm sure I'm just being without clue, here, but -- Summon the > Serpent has some plain card text (very straightforward) and some > bold card text. But it's not a Discipline card, it just requires > a Follower of Set to play. So when does the bold text kick in? Summon the Serpent [AH] - Action (FoS) (2) * Ignore the superior version text on Summon the Serpent. [TOM 960604] -- L. Scott Johnson (vte...@wizards.com) Official VtES Net.Rep for Wizards of the Coast. (*) - Subject to review by Rules Team

Joshua Duffin

Bryant Durrell (dur...@toybox.flick.com) wrote: : OK, I'm sure I'm just being without clue, here, but -- Summon the : Serpent has some plain card text (very straightforward) and some : bold card text. But it's not a Discipline card, it just requires : a Follower of Set to play. So when does the bold text kick in? Hey, you play Jyhad too? The good doomed games attract all the same people, don't they... (As LSJ already explained, the 'superior' version of Summon the Serpent doesn't officially exist. Supposedly it's actually a FoS clan card, therefore having no superior. It certainly looks like it was originally meant to be a Serpentis card though.) Josh plays a couple dead games

Bryant Durrell

In article <6f9tkk$d...@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu>, Joshua Duffin <du...@newton.ruph.cornell.edu> wrote: >Bryant Durrell (dur...@toybox.flick.com) wrote: >: OK, I'm sure I'm just being without clue, here, but -- Summon the >: Serpent has some plain card text (very straightforward) and some >: bold card text. But it's not a Discipline card, it just requires >: a Follower of Set to play. So when does the bold text kick in? > >Hey, you play Jyhad too? The good doomed games attract all the same >people, don't they... Yeah, the distinguished Jamie Z. got me into the game, and with the Edgeman selling those cheap boxes how could I resist? >(As LSJ already explained, the 'superior' version of Summon the >Serpent doesn't officially exist. Supposedly it's actually a FoS >clan card, therefore having no superior. It certainly looks like it >was originally meant to be a Serpentis card though.) Thanks to both you and LSJ! -- Bryant Durrell [] dur...@innocence.com [] http://www.innocence.com/~durrell [----------------------------------------------------------------------------] "You can tell the ideals of a nation by its advertisements." -- Norman Douglas

Jasper Phillips

In article <6f9tkk$d...@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu>, Joshua Duffin <du...@newton.ruph.cornell.edu> wrote: >Bryant Durrell (dur...@toybox.flick.com) wrote: > >Hey, you play Jyhad too? The good doomed games attract all the same >people, don't they... I was wondering about that. ;-) >Josh > >plays a couple dead games They're not dead, they're just cheap to get into! -- /\ Jasper Phillips /VVVVVVVVVVVVVV|~"~"~"~"~"~"----------........____ jaz j^^^^^^^^^^^^^\/"~"~"~"~-----------........._____ ~"~--. * http://www.engr.orst.edu/~philljas/ "~"~'--`