Rigby vs. Writ of Acceptance.

In a game last weekend, Rigby attempted to block my predator's attempt to equip Ian Wallingford(bishop) with a Writ of Acceptance, and failed to generate intercept. Ian was the only bishop controlled by my predator, and had 2 blood. So. Does Rigby move a blood to Ian, or does the Writ action succeed first? The table decided Rigby should move a blood, as the block attempt fails before the action is successful (other minions, including those of the acting minion's predator, could block, etc...). Was this the correct analysis? :D Mike P. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/

[ quoted text not captured ] Yes. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) VTES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/ [ quoted text not captured ]

In article <91mork$2c4$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote: > evilp...@my-deja.com wrote: > > In a game last weekend, Rigby attempted to block my predator's attempt > > to equip Ian Wallingford(bishop) with a Writ of Acceptance, and failed > > to generate intercept. Ian was the only bishop controlled by my > > predator, and had 2 blood. > > > > So. Does Rigby move a blood to Ian, or does the Writ action succeed > > first? The table decided Rigby should move a blood, as the block > > attempt fails before the action is successful (other minions, > > including those of the acting minion's predator, could block, etc...). > > Was this the correct analysis? > > Yes. > What if he had failed to block, wwaked with another vamp and failed and then drew an intercept and blocked with Rigby (siccessfully) again? Would the blood then be moved back to him? Or if this is considered a new block (but what if he had played a WWEF the first time around..and based on that card he now played na intercept?)? [ quoted text not captured ]

cantila wrote: > What if he had failed to block, wwaked with another vamp and failed and > then drew an intercept and blocked with Rigby (siccessfully) again? > Would the blood then be moved back to him? Or if this is considered a > new block (but what if he had played a WWEF the first time around..and > based on that card he now played na intercept?)? Ribgy would only "fail to block" when her controller annouced "no more block attempts". -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. [ quoted text not captured ]

On Tue, 19 Dec 2000 07:43:19 -0500, LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote: >cantila wrote: >> What if he had failed to block, wwaked with another vamp and failed and >> then drew an intercept and blocked with Rigby (siccessfully) again? >> Would the blood then be moved back to him? Or if this is considered a >> new block (but what if he had played a WWEF the first time around..and >> based on that card he now played na intercept?)? > >Ribgy would only "fail to block" when her controller annouced "no more >block attempts". ...Or when another vampire controlled by that same Methuselah successfully blocked, after Rigby had previously announced an attempt to block? =) -- Derek Goon-of-the-Month club member

Derek Ray wrote: > LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote: > > >cantila wrote: > >> What if he had failed to block, wwaked with another vamp and failed and > >> then drew an intercept and blocked with Rigby (siccessfully) again? > >> Would the blood then be moved back to him? Or if this is considered a > >> new block (but what if he had played a WWEF the first time around..and > >> based on that card he now played na intercept?)? > > > >Ribgy would only "fail to block" when her controller annouced "no more > >block attempts". > > ...Or when another vampire controlled by that same Methuselah > successfully blocked, after Rigby had previously announced an attempt > to block? =) Right, my oversight. :-) [ quoted text not captured ]