Army of Rats

I need to know the official ruling on whether or not Army of Rats is cumulative. In other words, if my predator has 3 Army of Rats up, do I lose 3 pool during his untap, or only one? Vincent, Elder of Minneapolis

[ quoted text not captured ] >Vincent, Elder of Minneapolis The way we play is that it *is* cumulative. It doesn't say otherwise.... Chris Congdon caco...@indyunix.iupui.edu

con...@indy.net (Chris Congdon) writes: [ quoted text not captured ] >>Vincent, Elder of Minneapolis [ quoted text not captured ] The official ruling from Tom is that AoR are not cumulative. This is errata.

mbi...@ibm.net wrote: : I need to know the official ruling on whether or not Army of Rats is cumulative. In other words, if my predator has 3 Army of Rats up, do I lose 3 pool during his untap, or only one? : Vincent, Elder of Minneapolis I believe the official ruling is that it is _not_ cumulative. Having three out simply means that it is much more difficult to avoid the loss of pool. -- Eric Eslinger, esli...@cps.msu.edu (__) Hey I'm a cow, I'm curious. (oo) Hey watch me now, I'm furious. /-------\/ Hey I'm a cow, I'm full of hate. / | || Hey watch me now, I'm on your plate. * ||----|| - the Barenaked Ladies ~~ ~~ moo GM/GS d--@ H+ s g+(?) p? !au a-- w+(++) (!)v+(*) C++ ULUO-++&$ P+ L+>+++ E--- W--- !M V -po+ R G++>++++ b++ D++ e+ u+(--) h-- f+ r++ n+ y+

>There has been errata issued to the effect that multiple rats in play >have no extra effect. So in other words, they aren't cumulative. >-ben Where was this errata printed? I've checked the "Deckmaster Errata" in Duelist #3 and it ain't there. I was told that it was printed in Duelist #3, but can't find where. Could I get a page # please? Thanks in advance, Vincent, Elder of Minneapolis