[LSJ] Priscus vote to burn a Fee Stake

Hello, A referendum to burn a Fee Stake is called. Are Priscus sub-referendum's votes affected by the clause "In that referendum, non-anarch titles are worth 1 fewer votes", as in Free States Rant ? Thank you, François

François wrote: > Hello, > > A referendum to burn a Fee Stake is called. Are Priscus > sub-referendum's votes affected by the clause "In that referendum, > non-anarch titles are worth 1 fewer votes", as in Free States Rant ? No.

LSJ wrote: > François wrote: > > Hello, > > > > A referendum to burn a Fee Stake is called. Are Priscus > > sub-referendum's votes affected by the clause "In that referendum, > > non-anarch titles are worth 1 fewer votes", as in Free States Rant ? > > No. Why did you rule this way LSJ? I don't exactly have a dog in this fight, but I wanted to understand the logic since you made the following ruling: *** dhart...@san.rr.com (Dan Harting) wrote in message <news:366bfade.0107091855.3d688691@posting.google.com>... > LSJ <vtes...@white-wolf.com> wrote: > > James Coupe wrote: > > > Gomi no Sensei <g...@best.com> writes > > > >(b) All Prisci cast 1 fewer vote during the Prisci sub-vote; the Prisci > > > >abstain unless Gratiano is out, and the Prisci block is worth 3 votes > > > >as normal. > > > This is correct, so far as I can tell. > > Correct. The title "Priscus" is worth 1 vote in the Priscus > > sub-referendum. > > It is worth 1 less vote in that sub-referendum during the Free States > > Rant. > Just curious - I don't mean to be annoying: > How many votes does Genevieve have during a Free States Rant? > (0 of each?) The title is worth 1 less. Nothing is said about the special ability. So she has 1 in the main referendum (special ability), and zero in the Prisci sub-referendum. > How many votes does a Regent have during a Free States Rant? > (3?) Yes.

Defender of Ra wrote: > Why did you rule this way LSJ? I don't exactly have a dog in this > fight, but I wanted to understand the logic since you made the > following ruling [about Free States Rant]: Free States Rant contains the special text needed to affect the prisci sub-referendum. Fee Stakes don't. John Eno

Kushiel wrote: > Defender of Ra wrote: > > Why did you rule this way LSJ? I don't exactly have a dog in this > > fight, but I wanted to understand the logic since you made the > > following ruling [about Free States Rant]: > > Free States Rant contains the special text needed to affect the prisci > sub-referendum. Fee Stakes don't. Correct.