WIN wrote:
>>No. Even if all the Gangrel in play are Camarilla, their locations "require
>>an Independent clan" by the current rules.
>
> That is stupid. Sorry, but is there anywhere written "Camarilla
> Location"?
No, not even on Al-Ashrad's card text.
Al-Ashrads card text says "Camarilla Clan".
The list of Camarilla Clan *is* detailed in the rulebook. [10.1]
> This is such a nonsense, because if Camarilla Gangrels are
> able to play those locations, how can it become independent? Will
It (the location) doesn't "become" independent. Locations don't
have sect (that would be stupid). Vampires have sect. Clans have
sect. Just because a given Gargoyle is Camarilla or Sabbat doesn't
change the fact that the Gargoyle clan is independent. Similarly
the Gangrel clan.
> Al-Ashrad be able to burn down Ravnos locations now?
?
No. Ravnos is not a Camarilla Clan. [10.1]
> Another stupid thing is that "default sect" for clans. Sorry if I play
> EMBRANCE with old Camarilla Gangrel, how can the child become
> independent? The child should follow it's sire.
Ask Lucita.
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/