Well, with all the talk of the artwork fiasco, and crucifying Gary
Chatterton, I'm sitting here sorting my new cards and I wonder one thing:
How did the Auspex skill card manage to keep the artwork from Sabbat?
Is WW going to get in Big Trouble for re-using WotC-era art? :)
(I don't think I'm going to get an official answer to this one, but I'm
stirring discussion)
On Mar 6, 9:16 am, Jozxyqk <jfeue...@eecs.tufts.edu> wrote:
[ quoted text not captured ]
Disagree. I like new artwork. I've also decided to play as many of
the new Deflections as possible. I think they're funny and not nearly
as bad as people are saying. It's not like the old version was
particularly evocative (hmm... bloody guy meets short guy in blurry
hallway... yep, that certainly explains Deflection).
[ quoted text not captured ]
In don't think Josh was saying that he favors relicensing over new
art.
I think he was saying he favors relicensing to enable a reprint over
not reprinting at all.
On Mar 6, 5:54 pm, Jozxyqk <jfeue...@eecs.tufts.edu> wrote:
[ quoted text not captured ]
IANN...
4x Lambach 10 ANI AUS DOM VIC pre cardinal Tzimisce:2
4x Lambach Adv 10 ANI AUS DOM VIC pre 2 votes Tzimisce:2
4x Frederick the Weak 2 pre !Brujah:2
Library [77 cards]
-------------------
Action [13]
13x Legion
Master [64]
45 x Auspex
4x Blood Doll
5x Secure Haven
1x Sunset Strip, Hollywood
5x Tribute to the Master
4x Waste Management Operation
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 10:12:13 -0800 (PST), JEH <john.h...@bigfoot.com>
wrote:
> On Mar 6, 5:54ᅵpm, Jozxyqk <jfeue...@eecs.tufts.edu> wrote:>> XZealot <xzea...@cox.net> wrote:[ quoted text not captured ]
Ban Auspex!
--
Regards,
Daneel
"Jozxyqk" <jfeu...@eecs.tufts.edu> wrote in message
news:hmtta0$8g5$3...@news.eternal-september.org...
[ quoted text not captured ]
OH, DUDE! You missed the chance to post the perfect one word reply to
LSJ!