rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

Antonio Delgado,Lasombra question

2 messages from 2 participants · 26 June 1998
original thread on Google Groups

Fantasy15

Okay, I've been reviewing the eratta and have a question. The new errata states that an unblocked political action is successful even if the referendum fails. Here is my question: Alvaro, the Lasombra Scion of Angelica, has the political card already played on him successfully giving him one extra bleed. This card can be burned by any Sabbat vampire as a political action, which Antonio Delgado attempts and is not blocked. During the referendum, Alvaro abstains, gaining two blood and Antonio votes no. There are no other votes and the referendum fails. Does Antonio untap at the end of the turn, or is this combo just plain wrong? Please give me some rapid response because my Lasombras are anxious to gain free blood and political power.

LSJ

Fantasy15 wrote: > Okay, I've been reviewing the eratta and have a question. The new errata > states that an unblocked political action is successful even if the referendum > fails. Here is my question: > > Alvaro, the Lasombra Scion of Angelica, has the political card already played > on him successfully giving him one extra bleed. "Sabbat Inquisitor", OK. > This card can be burned by any > Sabbat vampire as a political action, which Antonio Delgado attempts and is not > blocked. During the referendum, Alvaro abstains, gaining two blood and Antonio > votes no. There are no other votes and the referendum fails. Does Antonio > untap at the end of the turn, or is this combo just plain wrong? Antonio only untaps if the vote passes. [LSJ 970224]. Many cards use "political action" to refer to the referendum. This can be confusing. -- L. Scott Johnson (vte...@wizards.com) VTES Net.Rep for Wizards of the Coast. Searchable database of official card text, errata, and rulings: http://deckserver.net/cgi-deckserver/rulemonger.cgi/powersearch