Free Fight we already see.
Let the speculation run rampant: what are the next 29 blurred cards?
best,
Fabio "Sooner" Macedo
<Mode="Orpheus Style"> Looking for the Giovanni or Necro card. WHAT?
NONE? LSJ, your SOUL is MINE ;D</mode>
On 5 Oct 2005 12:10:47 -0700, Fabio 'Sooner' Macedo
<fabio....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Free Fight we already see.
>
> Let the speculation run rampant: what are the next 29 blurred cards?
WTF? The bottom right card seems like a Salubri Antitribu? With TWO
SUPERIOR DISCIPLINES? And with ALL IN-CLAN DISCIPLINES? I mean, the
design team should totally resign or something, they are out of
their minds. The whole game will be turned upside down by this
BROKEN BROKEN card!
I hope he's group 9.
;)
--
Bye,
Daneel
My guesses:
1. Free Fight
2. I think it's an Akunanse
3. The symbol is weird, so I guess it's an Abombwe card
4. Muricia, she who calls
5. Salubri antitribu card?
6. Guhuri (deck cover)
7. ??
8. Daughter of Cacophony with mel FOR
9. obeah and dominate
10. ??
11. Spiritus?
12. Looks like a Setite, but seems to me it has OBE, so it might be a
Salubri
13. ??
14. Ishtarri (also deck cover)
15. ??
16. Kiasyd
17. ??
18. the only thing you can see is that it's Sabbat
19. equipment
20. Lasombra
21. Flight
22. ??
23. ??
24. True Brujah
25. ??
26. Gargoyle with FOR VIS
27. ??
28. Ravnos with ANI CHI FOR PRE
29. ??
30. Salubri antitribu with aus FOR VAL (if he's group 3 I swear I'll
cry happy tears)
Those are my guesses... but as we're going to have new card displayed
every weekday, it won't take long to find out the truth :D
Cheers
FC
Fabio Ciccone wrote:
> My guesses:
>
> 1. Free Fight
> 2. I think it's an Akunanse
> 3. The symbol is weird, so I guess it's an Abombwe card
Looks like a master to me, that requires the clan of card 2.
> 4. Muricia, she who calls
> 5. Salubri antitribu card?
Also a master, you can almost read the word "master" on it in bold.
> 6. Guhuri (deck cover)
> 7. ??
Master requiring Guruhi?
> 8. Daughter of Cacophony with mel FOR
> 9. obeah and dominate
> 10. ??
hard to tell, maybe a blood brother?
> 11. Spiritus?
looks vaguely like another sanguinus card, but it's hard to tell.
Definitely dual-use (action modifier/reaction or action
modifier/combat?)
> 12. Looks like a Setite, but seems to me it has OBE, so it might be a
> Salubri
Pretty sure that's a really blurred SER, but you could be right.
> 13. ??
Assamite Master.
> 14. Ishtarri (also deck cover)
> 15. ??
requires Ishtarri. Looks like an action card maybe?
> 16. Kiasyd
> 17. ??
Master with no clan requirement.
> 18. the only thing you can see is that it's Sabbat
Harbinger of Skulls. I'm pretty certain.
> 19. equipment
> 20. Lasombra
> 21. Flight
> 22. ??
Samedi. It's the right look, and appears to have thn.
> 23. ??
action card, no clan or discipline requirement.
> 24. True Brujah
> 25. ??
looks like THN
> 26. Gargoyle with FOR VIS
> 27. ??
another master
> 28. Ravnos with ANI CHI FOR PRE
> 29. ??
Action or modifier requiring Trujah
> 30. Salubri antitribu with aus FOR VAL (if he's group 3 I swear I'll
> cry happy tears)
>
> Those are my guesses... but as we're going to have new card displayed
> every weekday, it won't take long to find out the truth :D
>
>
> Cheers
> FC
It all looks pretty cool to me.
Fabio Ciccone wrote:
> My guesses:
Here's mine. Mind you, some are based on the legacies icons available
through the KotEK book.
> 1. Free Fight
> 2. I think it's an Akunanse
Osebo (hammer/axe symbol)
> 3. The symbol is weird, so I guess it's an Abombwe card
Master, requiring Osebo.
> 4. Muricia, she who calls
> 5. Salubri antitribu card?
> 6. Guhuri (deck cover)
> 7. ??
Master, requires Guruhi?
> 8. Daughter of Cacophony with mel FOR
> 9. obeah and dominate
> 10. ??
Akunanse (spider symbol)
> 11. Spiritus?
Based on the former Akunanse's discipline spread, I'd say a card that
requires Abombwe.
> 12. Looks like a Setite, but seems to me it has OBE, so it might be a
> Salubri
Definitely a Setite with [obf pre SER]... The symbol does not resemble
the Obeah on the card #9 above.
> 13. ??
Master, requires Assamite.
> 14. Ishtarri (also deck cover)
> 15. ??
Action Modifier, requires Ishtarri.
> 16. Kiasyd
... with [obt pot DOM MYT NEC]?
> 17. ??
Regular master.
> 18. the only thing you can see is that it's Sabbat
Harbinger with FOR NEC. The inferior discipline does not seem to be
[aus].
> 19. equipment
> 20. Lasombra
> 21. Flight
> 22. ??
Don't know. It seems to be a Samedi (due to background), but the hat
symbol either is too blurred or it isn't a Samedi. The second
discipline seems to be Thanatosis... But then, the third should be
either Thaumaturgy, Vicissitude or Visceratika (alphabetical order),
and doesn't seem to be none of these.
I'd say that the second discipline is not Thanatosis and there's
something going on with this particular picture. Maybe Ghiberti as a
new clan, and the vampire has [dom nec pot]? Who knows?
> 23. ??
Action, no requirement.
> 24. True Brujah
> 25. ??
Action, requires Thanatosis?
> 26. Gargoyle with FOR VIS
> 27. ??
Regular master.
> 28. Ravnos with ANI CHI FOR PRE
and [aus].
> 29. ??
Action, requires True Brujah?
> 30. Salubri antitribu with aus FOR VAL (if he's group 3 I swear I'll
> cry happy tears)
Me too! :D
> Those are my guesses... but as we're going to have new card displayed
> every weekday, it won't take long to find out the truth :D
> Cheers
> FC
Yay! That's a preview! :-D
best,
Fabio "Sooner" Macedo
Fabio 'Sooner' Macedo wrote:
> Fabio Ciccone wrote:
> > My guesses:
>
> Here's mine. Mind you, some are based on the legacies icons available
> through the KotEK book.
>> > 22. ??
>
> Don't know. It seems to be a Samedi (due to background), but the hat
> symbol either is too blurred or it isn't a Samedi. The second
> discipline seems to be Thanatosis... But then, the third should be
> either Thaumaturgy, Vicissitude or Visceratika (alphabetical order),
> and doesn't seem to be none of these.
>
> I'd say that the second discipline is not Thanatosis and there's
> something going on with this particular picture. Maybe Ghiberti as a
> new clan, and the vampire has [dom nec pot]? Who knows?
My guess based on the background: Nagaraja, with Necromancy as the
bottom discipline (and looks like Dominate as the top.)
> > Cheers
> > FC
>
> best,
>
> Fabio "Sooner" Macedo
-John "Not a Fabio" Flournoy
I doubt it is an other clan, specially Ghiberti, since there is already
a Ghiberti Giovanni in the game.
But then again, who would've expected the Abominations in KMW?
Cheers
FC
I'm going to thread jack in a minor way.
Does anyone have any idea whether the pre-release for this set is
supposed to be Nov 4,5,6 or Nov 11,12,13? It would really be helpful
for scheduling the event if that little piece of information was
available....
Thanks
-TTFn
On 5 Oct 2005 22:10:19 -0700, "The Kaiser" <alei...@stny.rr.com>
wrote:
>Does anyone have any idea whether the pre-release for this set is
>supposed to be Nov 4,5,6 or Nov 11,12,13?
Yes.
http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/ConclaveMonitor/message/882
Pre-releases should be run on November 11, 12, or 13. The set
officially releases on the 14th.
--
Oscar J. Garza III
Organized Play Coordinator
White Wolf Publishing, Inc.
1554 Litton Drive
Stone Mountain, GA 30083
Fabio 'Sooner' Macedo wrote:
> > 30. Salubri antitribu with aus FOR VAL (if he's group 3 I swear I'll
> > cry happy tears)
>
> Me too! :D
Interesting is, that WW seems to have noticed that they dont need to
redesign the backgrounds of clans they themself have introduced, like
they did with the Baali. The !Salubri has the old background.
In message <1128582896.3...@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
ThorR <tho...@gmail.com> writes:
>I'm pretty sure its: Predator's Transformation
>
>http://www.epilogue.net/cgi/database/art/view.pl?id=84029
Ken Meyer has been pretty accurate in general, but things do change
sometimes - presumably when an art director loves a piece of work, but
it isn't quite what they were after for that card.
The artwork for Rutor's Hand has "Tremere Convocation" written down the
side of it.
--
James Coupe
PGP Key: 0x5D623D5D YOU ARE IN ERROR.
EBD690ECD7A1FB457CA2 NO-ONE IS SCREAMING.
13D7E668C3695D623D5D THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION.
[ quoted text not captured ]
LOOOOOOOL
Yes. But we do KNOW a few things :
- there WILL be at least e new Giovanni
- there is at least one Kyasid with NEC
and we can HOPE for some others :
- several Kyasid with Obt / Nec (and some with Pot ?)!!!
- an obt/nec card to help with the transition
- some Samedi with Pot
- a Salubri with Nec/Dom ? Or maybe Nec / Tha ?!
Let's convoke the Spirits...
"Daneel" <dan...@eposta.hu> wrote in message
news:opsx6v9b...@news.chello.hu...
[ quoted text not captured ]
Or capacity 9..
regards
pallando
--------------------
pallando(at)gmx(dot)at
> > WTF? The bottom right card seems like a Salubri Antitribu? With TWO
> > SUPERIOR DISCIPLINES? And with ALL IN-CLAN DISCIPLINES? I mean, the
> > design team should totally resign or something, they are out of
> > their minds. The whole game will be turned upside down by this
> > BROKEN BROKEN card!
He's definitely Black Hand though (barely readable) ^_^
The Kaiser wrote:
> Does anyone have any idea whether the pre-release for this set is
> supposed to be Nov 4,5,6 or Nov 11,12,13? It would really be helpful
> for scheduling the event if that little piece of information was
> available....
Is someone in your neck of the woods gonna run one?
Score!
Peter D Bakija
pd...@lightlink.com
http://www.lightlink.com/pdb6
"So in conclusion, our business plan is to sell hot,
easily spilled liquids to naked people."
-Brittni Meil
[ quoted text not captured ]
For some reason I couldn't shake off the idea that the Nagaraja
wouldn't be represented because they were destroyed in WoD canon. But
yeah, no one brought up that to the fore, so it can be a Nagaraja.
About the disciplines... If the first is Dominate and the third is
Necromancy, it leaves us with only three options for the middle
discipline: Fortitude, Mytherceria and Melpominee. How weird would it
be for him to have Mytherceria? :D
> > > Cheers
> > > FC
> >
> > best,
> >
> > Fabio "Sooner" Macedo
>
> -John "Not a Fabio" Flournoy
And some simply does not believe when I say we're (the Fabios) out
there to conquer the world...
best,
Fabio "Still a Fabio" Macedo
Fabio 'Sooner' Macedo wrote:
> For some reason I couldn't shake off the idea that the Nagaraja
> wouldn't be represented because they were destroyed in WoD canon. But
> yeah, no one brought up that to the fore, so it can be a Nagaraja.
Every clan was destroyed in the WoD canon. Gehenna saw to that.
--
That is my story, be it bitter or be it sweet.
Keep a little and let a little come back to me.
LSJ (vtesr...@TRAPwhite-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep (remove spam trap to reply)
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/
LSJ wrote:
> Every clan was destroyed in the WoD canon. Gehenna saw to that.
And even before that, the Tremere antitribu were destroyed and even
most of the Ravnos.
I wouldn't mind if they decide to destroy the Setites too :P
Abs
Fabio Ciccone
storylinesp.vai.la
LSJ wrote:
> Fabio 'Sooner' Macedo wrote:
> > For some reason I couldn't shake off the idea that the Nagaraja
> > wouldn't be represented because they were destroyed in WoD canon. But
> > yeah, no one brought up that to the fore, so it can be a Nagaraja.
>
> Every clan was destroyed in the WoD canon. Gehenna saw to that.
Of course, but you know what I'm talking about - Nagaraja were swept
from the WoD canon before Gehenna, like the Gangrel leaving the
Camarilla and so on. Now that V:tES is the only game to carry on oWoD
and supposedly "went back in time", who knows what's to come...
But I was a fool to make the transposition to V:TES in my head when no
info on that was given. Y'know, once you get used to the notion on the
tabletop game...
best,
Fabio "Sooner" Macedo
