Due to the debatability of this topic, in accordance with 'Jyhad' ideals, does
anybondy think it would be a good idea to hold a vote of convocation members
for or against 4CL [Because there are no clear winnners.]
[Although I myself am an advocate for NCL]
Perhaps we should hold a vote here on the net. Post your opinion [Without the
arguments behind it] and we'll see how many people are for or against it.
aws...@madison.tec.wi.us
Allen Schmidt (aws...@madison.tec.wi.us) wrote:
: Due to the debatability of this topic, in accordance with 'Jyhad' ideals,: does anybondy think it would be a good idea to hold a vote of convocation
: members for or against 4CL [Because there are no clear winnners.]
Why? Some people will play with, some without... the only time there should
be conflict is when the two play together -- and those people can make the
vote themselves. As far as tourney rules go... I think one would like to
see an error-free version before we decide whether we need to change the
world...
-James
We have no intention of officially imposing a blanket card limit on VTES.
If people want to play with card limits, they can do so as a house rule.
Besides, if we did impose a limit, we'd just have bunches of people playing
no-limit as a house rule, so it wouldn't really change anything. Better
to leave the default as wide open.
Tom Wylie rec.games.trading-cards.* Network Representative for
aa...@cats.ucsc.edu Wizards of the Coast, Inc.