rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

Frontal Assault Question

12 messages from 7 participants · 18 October 2006 – 20 October 2006
original thread on Google Groups

Blooded Sand

Cannot seem any reason why not, but before I am overcome by a fit of the giggles, can someone please confirm for me: Does this card stack? Cos if it does, I have some truly horrible ideas brewing in my head right now.... Multi master phase deck, 3 FR in play, fame, TitR, Dragonbound, With Votes Obviously this is going to be Bru\!Bru, for votability, or Nos\!Nos Smack many minions, gain pool, prey lose pool. Call perpetual care. Ouch.... Probably Bru as 2nd trad for keeping the buggers in Torpor is very useful

XZealot

Blooded Sand wrote: > Cannot seem any reason why not, but before I am overcome by a fit of > the giggles, can someone please confirm for me: > Does this card stack? Sure, good luck lining that up. Comments Welcome, Norman S. Brown, Jr XZealot Archon of the Swamp

Blooded Sand

[ quoted text not captured ] Thanks for the sarcasm, however, my question is still: Does this card stack?

XZealot

[ quoted text not captured ] You're Welcome, there's plenty where that came from. :) I believe they stack as there is no card text nor rulings to indicate that they don't [ quoted text not captured ]

Jeroen Rombouts

"Blooded Sand" <sand...@gmail.com> schreef in bericht news:1161142587.5...@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com... > Cannot seem any reason why not, but before I am overcome by a fit of > the giggles, can someone please confirm for me: > Does this card stack? yup. And for NRA purposes the rush actions are different too, i think. > > Multi master phase deck, 3 FR in play, fame, TitR, Dragonbound, With > Votes > Obviously this is going to be Bru\!Bru, for votability, or Nos\!Nos > > Smack many minions, gain pool, prey lose pool. Call perpetual care. > Ouch.... > Probably Bru as 2nd trad for keeping the buggers in Torpor is very > useful err. lot of moving parts. Probably better with the nos princes of group 1 with for. better intercept and they can play freak drive and attack again. That's probably the best use for Frontal Assault: to add it in an intercept combat deck. Or maybe an Edged Illusion deck, because the card doesn't specify how your prey's vampires must go to torpor/get burned.

LSJ

XZealot wrote: > Blooded Sand wrote: >> Cannot seem any reason why not, but before I am overcome by a fit of >> the giggles, can someone please confirm for me: >> Does this card stack? > > Sure, Correct.

Gregory Stuart Pettigrew

Frontal Assault [Third:U] Cardtype: Master Master. Put this card in play. Each ready minion you control may enter combat with any minion controlled by your prey as a (D) action. You gain 1 pool each time a ready minion controlled by your prey is burned or sent to torpor. During your influence phase, burn this card and burn 1 pool for each ready minion controlled by your prey. Artist: David Day Jeroen Rombouts wrote: > That's probably the best use for Frontal Assault: to add it in an intercept > combat deck. Or maybe an Edged Illusion deck, because the card doesn't > specify how your prey's vampires must go to torpor/get burned. How does an Intercept Combat deck put its prey's minions into torpor during its own Minion phase? By giving up on the "Intercept" part? -- - Gregory Stuart Pettigrew

Jeroen

Gregory Stuart Pettigrew schreef: [ quoted text not captured ] by combat of course :-) By not diluting your deck with rushes (always nice in an intercept combat deck, to clear you hand of combat cards) but adding 4 (or so) FA in a deck. Not usable if you're playing a rotschreck deck, but, for ex, an animalism intercept deck could use it. And because, you're playing intercept, the vamps you put in torpor never come out again, unless rescued cross table.

Rob Grau

Jeroen wrote: > Gregory Stuart Pettigrew schreef: > > Jeroen Rombouts wrote: > > > That's probably the best use for Frontal Assault: to add it in an intercept > > > combat deck. Or maybe an Edged Illusion deck, because the card doesn't > > > specify how your prey's vampires must go to torpor/get burned. > > > > How does an Intercept Combat deck put its prey's minions into torpor > > during its own Minion phase? By giving up on the "Intercept" part? > > by combat of course :-) By not diluting your deck with rushes (always > nice in an intercept combat deck, to clear you hand of combat cards) > but adding 4 (or so) FA in a deck. Not usable if you're playing a > rotschreck deck, but, for ex, an animalism intercept deck could use it. > > And because, you're playing intercept, the vamps you put in torpor > never come out again, unless rescued cross table. If I understood Gregory's post correctly, the issue was that your intercept combat deck is already blocking your prey's actions and sending the vampires to torpor, so why would you include Frontal Assault? If you're using intercept to get into combat, your deck isn't diluted with rush actions to start with. Rob Grau rfg...@eos.ncsu.edu

Gregory Stuart Pettigrew

Rob Grau wrote: > > > How does an Intercept Combat deck put its prey's minions into torpor > > > during its own Minion phase? By giving up on the "Intercept" part? > > > > If I understood Gregory's post correctly, the issue was that your > intercept combat deck is already blocking your prey's actions and > sending the vampires to torpor, so why would you include Frontal > Assault? > > If you're using intercept to get into combat, your deck isn't diluted > with rush actions to start with. > I was mostly checking to see if he was misreading the card. It's possible he (like some others) misinterpreted when Frontal Assault did its damage. An Intercept Combat deck could make a great deal of use out of FA: Having blocked all of its prey's actions and weakened all of its prey's minions, it plays FA during its Master Phase, rushing and torporizing many of its prey's minions. It then plays Dragonbound during its Discard Phase as the coup de grace. [ quoted text not captured ]

Jeroen Rombouts

"Gregory Stuart Pettigrew" <gpett...@gmail.com> schreef in bericht news:1161279525.0...@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > Rob Grau wrote: >> > > I was mostly checking to see if he was misreading the card. It's > possible he (like some others) misinterpreted when Frontal Assault did > its damage. An Intercept Combat deck could make a great deal of use out > of FA: Having blocked all of its prey's actions and weakened all of its > prey's minions, it plays FA during its Master Phase, rushing and > torporizing many of its prey's minions. It then plays Dragonbound > during its Discard Phase as the coup de grace. > yes. That was what I meant :-) But maybe, it can help those decks that don't have acces to eagle sight-like effects.

Jeroen Rombouts

"Rob Grau" <rfg...@eos.ncsu.edu> schreef in bericht news:1161279040....@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com... [ quoted text not captured ] On the rare occasion that I play intercept combat, I usually add a couple of rush actions. Helps to clear your hand of combat cards, when people stop acting. Or helps to draw the next eagle sight when they only do D-actions.