rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

On the question of Ghoul retainers.

4 messages from 3 participants · 29 January 1999 – 31 January 1999
original thread on Google Groups

Vince Johnson

I have a torie with a ghoul retainer and a .44. My Torie opts not to use the gun for the first strike and let's the retainer take it. My Torie strikes with hands and then adds 2 strikes via a blur. Can the torie take the gun back to use for those 2 actions? Vince

LSJ

[ quoted text not captured ] Yes. -- L. Scott Johnson (vte...@wizards.com) VTES Net.Rep for Wizards of the Coast. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and DCI (tournament) rules: http://www.wizards.com/VTES/VTES_Rules.html

James Coupe

In article <78sve9$ok2@simba>, Vince Johnson <john...@tcnj.edu> writes >My Torie >strikes with hands and then adds 2 strikes via a blur. Can the torie take >the gun back to use for those 2 actions? The concept of the Toreador having to take the gun back is what is stopping you seeing this. The Ghoul Retainer merely uses it. It is never transferred to him. The Toreador still has the gun. -- James Coupe (Prince of Mercia, England) Vampire: Elder Kindred Network http://madnessnetwork.hexagon.net

Vince Johnson

>The concept of the Toreador having to take the gun back is what is >stopping you seeing this. The Ghoul Retainer merely uses it. It is >never transferred to him. The Toreador still has the gun. I realize this, but I wasn't sure if the ghoul retainer's restriction that the torie isn't using the gun meant the round or just that strike in that round. Thanks Vince