rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

[LSJ] Free states rant

9 messages from 7 participants · 13 June 2003
original thread on Google Groups

Pedroletti Marc

Hi, In the rule book :"treat vampires with titles as if they had titles of their own." Free states rant says :"titles are worth 1 less vote.." If, say Aziz, cast successfully Free states rant, does he have his 2 votes as written on him or does he have only 1 vote for this referendum ? Thanks

The Lasombra

salem

On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 01:53:53 +0200, "Pedroletti Marc" <pedrole...@wanadoo.fr> scrawled: >Hi, > >In the rule book :"treat vampires with titles as if they had titles of their >own." i assume you meant "Some Independent vampires may start with votes, as listed on card text. Treat these vampires as if they had titles of their own." >Free states rant says :"titles are worth 1 less vote.." > >If, say Aziz, cast successfully Free states rant, does he have his 2 votes >as written on him or does he have only 1 vote for this referendum ? although TheLasombra answered this question for you....you did answer it yourself just from reading the rulebook and card text. Let that be an example for everyone! reading the rulebook and card text! yay! i might even try it myself sometime.... salem domain:canberra http://www.geocities.com/salem_christ.geo/vtes.htm

Timlagor

>>Free states rant says :"titles are worth 1 less vote.." >> >>If, say Aziz, cast successfully Free states rant, does he have his 2 votes >>as written on him or does he have only 1 vote for this referendum ? > > although TheLasombra answered this question for you....you did answer > it yourself just from reading the rulebook and card text. > > Let that be an example for everyone! reading the rulebook and card > text! yay! > > i might even try it myself sometime.... Bah you'll be expecting people to use Google to search for answers too next!

Halcyan 2

>> although TheLasombra answered this question for you....you did answer >> it yourself just from reading the rulebook and card text. >> >> Let that be an example for everyone! reading the rulebook and card >> text! yay! >> >> i might even try it myself sometime.... >Bah you'll be expecting people to use Google to search for answers too >next! > No, but *I* definitely expect most people to spent at least a little effort and look on Google first... =) Halcyan 2

LSJ

Halcyan 2 wrote: > No, but *I* definitely expect most people to spent at least a little effort and > look on Google first... Correct. [Halcyan2 11-JAN-2002] :-) -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

Curevei

>No, but *I* definitely expect most people to spent at least a little effort >and >look on Google first... Maybe I can get a citation from 2002 where I state this same thing. My newsgroup reader setup doesn't make searching Google anywhere near as easy as reading new posts.

LSJ

Curevei wrote: > My newsgroup reader setup doesn't make searching Google anywhere near as easy > as reading new posts. I didn't even know you /could/ search Google archives with a newsgroup reader. I thought the search stuff was web browser only. At any rate, the web browser interface (http://groups.google.com and http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search) is plenty easy. [ quoted text not captured ]

Timlagor

On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 10:04:34 -0400, LSJ wrote: > Halcyan 2 wrote: >> No, but *I* definitely expect most people to spent at least a little effort and >> look on Google first... > > Correct. [Halcyan2 11-JAN-2002] >:-) aLOL (actually LOL)