[LSJ] Deflection/eagle's sight

Scenario: Methuselah A's turn -Vampire A bleeds Methuselah B -Methuselah B's Vampire B plays an eagle's sight at superior and declines to block -Vampire B deflects the bleed to Methuselah C with a superior deflection -Methuselah C declines to block -Vampire B attempts to block This is legal right? thanks in advance, -D

Darky <jja....@hccnet.nl> skrev i diskussionsgruppsmeddelandet:93148a54.02112...@posting.google.com... > Scenario: > > Methuselah A's turn > > -Vampire A bleeds Methuselah B > > -Methuselah B's Vampire B plays an eagle's sight at superior and declines to block can't play ES and not block: [AUS] This reacting vampire attempts to block the current action, ignoring the normal prey, predator or target restrictions for blocking actions. /Henrik

[ quoted text not captured ] Vampire B has to attemt to block with Eagle's sight. He cannot decline.

jja....@hccnet.nl (Darky) wrote in message news:<93148a54.02112...@posting.google.com>... [ quoted text not captured ] Actually Meth B already declined to block. So no, its not legal. However, playing a deflection is not synonomous to declining to block. So had Meth. B just played a deflection and not declined to block, he would have been allowed to block. BTW: Why did methuselah B bounce it in the first place? Did he play the eagle's sight hoping to get combat, but drew into deflection, so he played the deflection, but then drew into the combat he wanted, so decided to block? ~SV

vermillian wrote: > > jja....@hccnet.nl (Darky) wrote in message news:<93148a54.02112...@posting.google.com>... > > Scenario: > > > > Methuselah A's turn > > > > -Vampire A bleeds Methuselah B > > > > -Methuselah B's Vampire B plays an eagle's sight at superior and declines to block > > > > -Vampire B deflects the bleed to Methuselah C with a superior deflection > > > > -Methuselah C declines to block > > > > -Vampire B attempts to block > > > > This is legal right? > > Actually Meth B already declined to block. So no, its not legal. ... that was before the Deflection. Once deflected, blocking opportunities reset. Eagle's Sight no longer gives a continuing effect, however, it just starts the block. Vampire B would have to play a new Eagle's Sight for this new block attempt. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

"LSJ" <vte...@white-wolf.com> a écrit dans le message de news: 3DE271B0...@white-wolf.com... > vermillian wrote: > > > > jja....@hccnet.nl (Darky) wrote in message news:<93148a54.02112...@posting.google.com>... > > > Scenario: > > > > > > Methuselah A's turn > > > > > > -Vampire A bleeds Methuselah B > > > > > > -Methuselah B's Vampire B plays an eagle's sight at superior and declines to block > > > > > > -Vampire B deflects the bleed to Methuselah C with a superior deflection > > > > > > -Methuselah C declines to block > > > > > > -Vampire B attempts to block > > > > > > This is legal right? > > > > Actually Meth B already declined to block. So no, its not legal. > > ... that was before the Deflection. > > Once deflected, blocking opportunities reset. > Eagle's Sight no longer gives a continuing effect, however, it just starts > the block. > Vampire B would have to play a new Eagle's Sight for this new block attempt. But Vampire B cannot play another Eagle Sight on the same action, right ? So the new blocking attempt cannot occur, IMHO (exept Falcon Eye or Anneke, of course...) François [ quoted text not captured ]

Miller Delmardigan wrote: > "LSJ" <vte...@white-wolf.com> a écrit dans le message de news: > > Once deflected, blocking opportunities reset. > > Eagle's Sight no longer gives a continuing effect, however, it just starts > > the block. > > Vampire B would have to play a new Eagle's Sight for this new block > attempt. > > But Vampire B cannot play another Eagle Sight on the same action, right ? > So the new blocking attempt cannot occur, IMHO (exept Falcon Eye or Anneke, > of course...) Right. [ quoted text not captured ]