rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

Surprising hosers...

27 messages from 10 participants · 02 September 2002 – 06 September 2002
original thread on Google Groups

reyda

I was looking for a way to resist those incredibly powerful decks... and i found some surprisingly strong and unexpected hosers =) 1- Follower of Set + free states rant is one of my worst nightmare. The simplest hoser is : Invitation accepted. Transform the serpent to camarilla vampires and they can't call the FSR vote anymore =) Everyone on the table will let the vote pass after the first harmful FSR =D 2-Agaitas monkey decks, which enter combat with you and play lotsa card to deplete cards from your library... Play Camarilla threat. Each time your predator takes a card from you, in addition of clogging his hand he will be forced to discard at the cost of 1 or more pool per card =D Does it also hose the discard effect from Dreams of the Sphinx ?? =) reyda

jspektr

"reyda" <true_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<3d739212$0$8650$79c1...@nan-newsreader-01.noos.net>... > 2-Agaitas monkey decks, which enter combat with you and play lotsa card to > deplete cards from your library... Play Camarilla threat. Each time your > predator takes a card from you, in addition of clogging his hand he will be > forced to discard at the cost of 1 or more pool per card =D > Does it also hose the discard effect from Dreams of the Sphinx ?? =) Camarilla Threat's text: "Political Card-Worth 1 Vote. Called by any vampire at +1 stealth. If this referendum is successful, put this card in play. Each Methuselah discarding a card during his or her discard phase burns one pool. Any vampire may call a referendum to burn this card as a +1 stealth political action." Agaitas's power would not come into effect, as the Camarilla Threat only counts cards discarded during the discard phase. The wording also seems to suggest it may be 1 pool regardless of how many cards are discarded, instead of 1 pool per card. JSpektr

reyda

jspektr wrote: :: "reyda" <true_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message :: news:<3d739212$0$8650$79c1...@nan-newsreader-01.noos.net>... :: :: ::: 2-Agaitas monkey decks, which enter combat with you and play ::: lotsa card to deplete cards from your library... Play Camarilla ::: threat. Each time your predator takes a card from you, in ::: addition of clogging his hand he will be forced to discard at the ::: cost of 1 or more pool per card =D Does it also hose the discard ::: effect from Dreams of the Sphinx ?? =) :: :: Camarilla Threat's text: (snip) :: Agaitas's power would not come into effect, as the Camarilla Threat :: only counts cards discarded during the discard phase. Did i say something different ? :: The wording :: also seems to suggest it may be 1 pool regardless of how many :: cards are discarded, instead of 1 pool per card. i think the wording makes you pay for each card. please provide correct answers ;)

RonnieE

jsp...@sprynet.com (jspektr) wrote in message news:<196f2577.02090...@posting.google.com>... > "reyda" <true_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<3d739212$0$8650$79c1...@nan-newsreader-01.noos.net>... Reyda wrote: "1- Follower of Set + free states rant is one of my worst nightmare. The simplest hoser is : Invitation accepted. Transform the serpent to camarilla vampires and they can't call the FSR vote anymore =) Everyone on the table will let the vote pass after the first harmful FSR =D" Thats really good thinking. I love doing FSR and then Banishment to put the vampire in his place, but by your solution that would be screwed from the time the vote passes. Easy one card solution that takes minimum deck space, my hat´s off to you. Ronnie

VRAGOZAKAS

"reyda" <true_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<3d739212$0$8650$79c1...@nan-newsreader-01.noos.net>... > I was looking for a way to resist those incredibly powerful decks... > and i found some surprisingly strong and unexpected hosers =) > > 1- Follower of Set + free states rant is one of my worst nightmare. The > simplest hoser is : Invitation accepted. Transform the serpent to camarilla > vampires and they can't call the FSR vote anymore =) Everyone on the table > will let the vote pass after the first harmful FSR =D YOU ARE A GENIUS! REALLY! > 2-Agaitas monkey decks, which enter combat with you and play lotsa card to > deplete cards from your library... Play Camarilla threat. Each time your > predator takes a card from you, in addition of clogging his hand he will be > forced to discard at the cost of 1 or more pool per card =D > Does it also hose the discard effect from Dreams of the Sphinx ?? =) MMMH, NO...THERE ISN'T ANY CONNECTION BETWEEN AGAITAS AND CAMARILLA THREAT. > reyda MANDI, VRAGOZAKAS

Halcyan 2

>1- Follower of Set + free states rant is one of my worst nightmare. The >simplest hoser is : Invitation accepted. Transform the serpent to camarilla >vampires and they can't call the FSR vote anymore =) Everyone on the table >will let the vote pass after the first harmful FSR =D Very nice indeed Reyda! I'm very impressed by your creativity! =) >2-Agaitas monkey decks, which enter combat with you and play lotsa card to >deplete cards from your library... Play Camarilla threat. Each time your >predator takes a card from you, in addition of clogging his hand he will be >forced to discard at the cost of 1 or more pool per card =D >Does it also hose the discard effect from Dreams of the Sphinx ?? =) Contrary to what some of the others are blathering about, you are right that (unless they have some other discard mechanism like Dreams/Barrens), if Agaitas causes them to draw a useless card, they will have to lose pool to Camarilla Threat to get rid of it. In general, it wouldn't affect other discard mechanisms (i.e. Dreams of the Sphinx) *unless* it was used during the discard phase (compare a similar situation to being able to use discarded Dreams card with Rachel Brandywine's ability during your discard). Halcyan 2

Joshua Duffin

"Halcyan 2" <halc...@aol.com> wrote in message news:20020903155804...@mb-mv.aol.com... [re Camarilla Threat] > In general, it wouldn't affect other discard mechanisms (i.e. Dreams of the > Sphinx) *unless* it was used during the discard phase (compare a similar > situation to being able to use discarded Dreams card with Rachel Brandywine's > ability during your discard). Does it apply to Dreams? The Barrens, if used during discard, yes. But Dreams discards-down-to-hand-size occur at the end of the turn, which I thought wasn't exactly during the discard phase. I'm not sure though... LSJ? Josh sphinxy

CurtAdams

Reyda wrote: >1- Follower of Set + free states rant is one of my worst nightmare. The >simplest hoser is : Invitation accepted. Transform the serpent to camarilla >vampires and they can't call the FSR vote anymore =) Everyone on the >table will let the vote pass after the first harmful FSR =D" Geez, Reyda, you faced my FOSFSR deck in LA for the mem day tournaments and I beat you by the barest of margins (something like 2 pool, wasn't it?) If that's one of your worst nightmares you must have very peaceful sleep! I'd much rather face such a deck than weenie dom, weenie pre, IG rush, Tzimiscze wall, prince bloat, and probably several other decks as well. BTW, the table isn't necessarily going to support the IA. The player's table allies will not want to see it completely shut down most of the time. Plus Rant decks are very good at bargaining for votes... Curt Adams (curt...@aol.com) "It is better to be wrong than to be vague" - Freeman Dyson

reyda

CurtAdams wrote: :: Reyda wrote: ::: 1- Follower of Set + free states rant is one of my worst ::: nightmare. The simplest hoser is : Invitation accepted. Transform ::: the serpent to camarilla vampires and they can't call the FSR ::: vote anymore =) Everyone on the table will let the vote pass ::: after the first harmful FSR =D" :: :: Geez, Reyda, you faced my FOSFSR deck in LA for the mem day :: tournaments and I beat you by the barest of margins (something :: like 2 pool, wasn't it?) yes ! it really was a nightmare, since if i recall correctly i was playing !gangrel .44 deck and i really needed the blood on my vamps =) :: If that's one of your worst nightmares :: you must have very peaceful sleep! I'd much rather face such :: a deck than weenie dom, weenie pre, IG rush, Tzimiscze wall, :: prince bloat, and probably several other decks as well. this !gangrel .44 horde deck has proven to be very efficient against weenie dom (lot of bum's rush) weenie pre (lots of psyche), Ig rush (lots of maneuvers backuping .44) and even tzimisce wall since i do intercept them and play rotschreck myself to their big surprise =) the only exception is voters, which are quite a pain in the neck, especially voters at stealth. (my anti bleed defense being sport bikes and pack tactics...) I had a hard time fighting against you =) :: BTW, the table isn't necessarily going to support the IA. The :: player's table allies will not want to see it completely shut :: down most of the time. Plus Rant decks are very good at :: bargaining for votes... After two or three succesful FSR, the table can feel hopeless, especially other vote decks who see their princes or priscus having half or none of their votes. The first time a titled vamp is hit by FSR, he will understand you give him a easy way to counter an otherwise unstoppable strategy =) Calling FSR + bewitching oration + Voter cap can burn 5 or 6 blood on other vampire, gaining blood and pool in the process. That should bug the table fairly rapidly ;) :: Curt Adams (curt...@aol.com) :: "It is better to be wrong than to be vague" - Freeman Dyson hope to play again with you =) reyda

LSJ

reyda wrote: > jspektr wrote: > :: The wording > :: also seems to suggest it may be 1 pool regardless of how many > :: cards are discarded, instead of 1 pool per card. > > i think the wording makes you pay for each card. Pay one for each discard phase in which you discard (one or more) cards. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

LSJ

Joshua Duffin wrote: > > "Halcyan 2" <halc...@aol.com> wrote in message > news:20020903155804...@mb-mv.aol.com... > > [re Camarilla Threat] > > > In general, it wouldn't affect other discard mechanisms (i.e. Dreams of > the > > Sphinx) *unless* it was used during the discard phase (compare a similar > > situation to being able to use discarded Dreams card with Rachel > Brandywine's > > ability during your discard). > > Does it apply to Dreams? If you make a wish to get +2 hand size during your turn, yes (since you will have to discard down during your discard phase when your hand size returns to normal). If you wish for +2 hand size during someone else's turn, no, since you're not discarding the extra cards in *your* discard phase. > The Barrens, if used during discard, yes. > But Dreams discards-down-to-hand-size occur at the end of the turn, > which I thought wasn't exactly during the discard phase. I'm not > sure though... LSJ? It's gotta be sometime. It ends up being your discard phase. [ quoted text not captured ]

Raille

LSJ wrote: > >> The Barrens, if used during discard, yes. >>But Dreams discards-down-to-hand-size occur at the end of the turn, >>which I thought wasn't exactly during the discard phase. I'm not >>sure though... LSJ? > > > It's gotta be sometime. > It ends up being your discard phase. > Just another reason for an official End of Turn Phase. Every I've played with considers the End of turn requirements to happen AFter the discard Phase. So are you making Official errata to the effect that the end of turn happens in the Discard Phase, and if So can you order the discard phase to suit your needs? Raille

reyda

LSJ wrote: > reyda wrote: >> jspektr wrote: >>>> The wording >>>> also seems to suggest it may be 1 pool regardless of how many >>>> cards are discarded, instead of 1 pool per card. >> >> i think the wording makes you pay for each card. > > Pay one for each discard phase in which you discard (one or more) > cards. so stacking them is useless despite the ambiguous wording... =/

LSJ

Raille wrote: > > LSJ wrote: > > > >> The Barrens, if used during discard, yes. > >>But Dreams discards-down-to-hand-size occur at the end of the turn, > >>which I thought wasn't exactly during the discard phase. I'm not > >>sure though... LSJ? > > > > > > It's gotta be sometime. > > It ends up being your discard phase. > > > > Just another reason for an official End of Turn Phase. > > Every I've played with considers the End of turn requirements to happen > AFter the discard Phase. If there's any basis for that consideration in the rules, please cite it. > So are you making Official errata to the effect that the end of turn > happens in the Discard Phase, and if So can you order the discard phase > to suit your needs? No. No errata needed. The end of your turn is the discard phase. After the discard phase, it is no longer your turn, per the rules. [ quoted text not captured ]

LSJ

[ quoted text not captured ] Useless except for the number of referendums that must be passed before the effect is ended. [ quoted text not captured ]

LSJ

LSJ wrote: > > reyda wrote: > > > > LSJ wrote: > > > reyda wrote: > > >> jspektr wrote: > > >>>> The wording > > >>>> also seems to suggest it may be 1 pool regardless of how many > > >>>> cards are discarded, instead of 1 pool per card. > > >> > > >> i think the wording makes you pay for each card. > > > > > > Pay one for each discard phase in which you discard (one or more) > > > cards. > > > > so stacking them is useless despite the ambiguous wording... =/ > > Useless except for the number of referendums that must be passed > before the effect is ended. ... and except for the stacked pool loss, of course. (sorry - still sleep deprived from Dragoncon). Multiple discards in the same discard phase won't cost extra pool, but multiple Camarilla Threat cards in play will stack. [ quoted text not captured ]

Raille

Raille wrote: > Just another reason for an official End of Turn Phase. > > Everyone I've played with considers the End of turn requirements to happen > AFter the discard Phase. >If there's any basis for that consideration in the rules, please cite it. Well a Host of games seem to do very well with official end of turn phases, even when they have zero game effects, unlike VTES. Examples: Luftwaffe: Q. American Playeer announces the end of his turn. German player begins. Scrabble: 2. A player completes the turn by counting and announcing the score. Monopoly: (a bit vague) After completed play, the turn passes to the left. Russian Front: 9.1 END OF TURN RECORD PHASE. At the end of every turn, advance the turn units on the Current date chart. Gettysburg '77: Phase 7. Move the turn marker to the next turn The Battle of the Bulge 5.4 The Time marker is moved one space to the next turn. And I can go on and on and on and on. Vtes at one time ended a turn once you dropped a card in the ash heap. Since its conception there has been the proverbial 'mission' (rules) creap. There are now several cards that refer to the end of turn. The original (and current) rules had you move directly to the next players turn once you have discarded. If I adhere to the printed rules, If I discard its player 'X's turn. There is no interupt. However I need to untap cause of a leather jacket or other effects at the end of the turn, I have to perform this prior to discarding since that immediatly triggers the next player effects. I cannot perform end of turn effects prior to discarding however, since my turn is not over. A simple addition under section 3. Playing the game as below cleans up the potentially growning problem with end of turn cards. 6. End of Turn also add section 9. End of Turn and rename current sections 10 and 11. 9. End of turn effects are performed, and turn proceeds to the next player. > So are you making Official errata to the effect that the end of turn > happens in the Discard Phase, and if So can you order the discard phase > to suit your needs? >No. No errata needed. The end of your turn is the discard phase. After the discard phase, it is no longer your turn, per the rules. Thats my point. I discard and fail to perform end of turn requirements, thus forfeiting the game for illegal play. Raille

LSJ

Raille wrote: > > Raille wrote: > > Just another reason for an official End of Turn Phase. > > > > Everyone I've played with considers the End of turn requirements to > happen > > AFter the discard Phase. > > >If there's any basis for that consideration in the rules, please cite it. > > Well a Host of games seem to do very well with official end of turn > phases, even when they have zero game effects, unlike VTES. > Examples: > Luftwaffe: > Q. American Playeer announces the end of his turn. German player begins. VTES has the same. VTES player announces that she is done with her turn. Prey begins. > Scrabble: > 2. A player completes the turn by counting and announcing the score. A VTES player completes the turn by finishing her discard phase. > Monopoly: > (a bit vague) After completed play, the turn passes to the left. After a completed turn, the turn passes to the left. > Russian Front: > 9.1 END OF TURN RECORD PHASE. At the end of every turn, advance the > turn units on the Current date chart. ? Sounds like the untap phase, but I can't be sure. > Gettysburg '77: > Phase 7. Move the turn marker to the next turn Turn passes to the left. > The Battle of the Bulge > 5.4 The Time marker is moved one space to the next turn. > > And I can go on and on and on and on. With similar results, I suspect. > Vtes at one time ended a turn once you dropped a card in the ash heap. Citation? > Since its conception there has been the proverbial 'mission' (rules) > creap. There are now several cards that refer to the end of turn. The > original (and current) rules had you move directly to the next players > turn once you have discarded. Citation? > If I adhere to the printed rules, If I discard its player 'X's turn. Citation to the printed rules? > There is no interupt. However I need to untap cause of a leather jacket > or other effects at the end of the turn, I have to perform this prior to > discarding since that immediatly triggers the next player effects. I > cannot perform end of turn effects prior to discarding however, since my > turn is not over. Not true. You can do them in the discard phase after discarding. > A simple addition under section 3. Playing the game as below cleans up > the potentially growning problem with end of turn cards. > 6. End of Turn > > also add section 9. End of Turn and rename current sections 10 and 11. > > 9. End of turn effects are performed, and turn proceeds to the next player. > > > So are you making Official errata to the effect that the end of turn > > happens in the Discard Phase, and if So can you order the discard phase > > to suit your needs? > > >No. No errata needed. The end of your turn is the discard phase. > After the discard phase, it is no longer your turn, per the rules. Right. The end of your turn is your discard phase. Glad you're on board. > Thats my point. I discard and fail to perform end of turn requirements, > thus forfeiting the game for illegal play. Hardly. [ quoted text not captured ]

Mike McDonald

halc...@aol.com (Halcyan 2) wrote in message news:<20020903155804...@mb-mv.aol.com>... > >1- Follower of Set + free states rant is one of my worst nightmare. The > >simplest hoser is : Invitation accepted. Transform the serpent to camarilla > >vampires and they can't call the FSR vote anymore =) Everyone on the table > >will let the vote pass after the first harmful FSR =D > > Very nice indeed Reyda! I'm very impressed by your creativity! =) > I use a similar theory in my toreador vote deck, although I use it against combat decks - so I have Elysiums and the Ravnos and Assamite join-the-camarilla cards in there too. Works a charm and makes people laugh :-)

Halcyan 2

>Just another reason for an official End of Turn Phase. > >Every I've played with considers the End of turn requirements to happen >AFter the discard Phase. > >So are you making Official errata to the effect that the end of turn >happens in the Discard Phase, and if So can you order the discard phase >to suit your needs? One of the trends of the Camarilla Edition is that many cards that used to function at the end of your turn now happen during your discard phase. So the discard phase is essentially the borderline to the literal end of your turn. Metro Underground is the most obvious example. Also compare the wording of Antonio Veradas compared to Gunther, Beast Lord (it uses the "during your discard phase" wording instead of "at the end of your turn"). Halcyan 2

Halcyan 2

>I use a similar theory in my toreador vote deck, although I use it >against combat decks - so I have Elysiums and the Ravnos and Assamite >join-the-camarilla cards in there too. Works a charm and makes people >laugh :-) I'm thinking a Malkavian Presence deck with the Elysium. In addition to Giovanni Acceptance, Ravnos Acceptance, Revocation of Tyre, and Invitation Accepted, you can also Derange vampires into Camarilla Malks to protect you! =) Halcyan 2

reyda

[ quoted text not captured ] Interesting but i doubt you can tap Elysium Thrice to avoid three consecutive assamite rushes =) (reminder : Elysium -the arboretum is unique =) )

Raille

LSJ wrote: >> > So are you making Official errata to the effect that the end of turn >> > happens in the Discard Phase, and if So can you order the discard phase >> > to suit your needs? >> >>No. No errata needed. The end of your turn is the discard phase. >>After the discard phase, it is no longer your turn, per the rules. > > Right. The end of your turn is your discard phase. Glad you're on board. > Actually you were replying to your self there. Stupid edit mode failed to place proper '>'s > >>Thats my point. I discard and fail to perform end of turn requirements, >>thus forfeiting the game for illegal play. > > > Hardly. > Glad to hear that. I'm just stating we have cards that discribe action you perform during your discard phase and s small but growing group of cards that make reference to the end of the turn. Last Question, since I don't want to go on endlessly about when a turn is over. Can you order the end of turn activities as you wish? or at least until there is other official rulings to the contrary. Raille

LSJ

Raille wrote: > Can you order the end of turn activities as you wish? Yes. [ quoted text not captured ]

Joshua Duffin

"Raille" <rai...@mich.com> wrote in message news:3D7672C0...@mich.com... > Glad to hear that. I'm just stating we have cards that discribe action > you perform during your discard phase and s small but growing group of > cards that make reference to the end of the turn. I think it's actually "small and dwindling". The cards I've seen from Camarilla Edition so far tend to use "end of discard phase" or "during discard phase" where they used to use "end of turn". As Halcyan pointed out, Metro Underground is a good example. Josh you got your end of turn in my discard phase!

Raille

Joshua Duffin wrote: > > you got your end of turn in my discard phase! > Damn, and I thought I got my end of turn in my discard phase. This really changes my play. Raille

Joshua Duffin

"Raille" <rai...@mich.com> wrote in message news:3D78C386...@mich.com... [ quoted text not captured ] Yes, you will find it difficult to oust your prey when your turn ends before it has even begun. :-) Josh the cheating phase never ends