In message <3EE3BE6...@mich.com>, Raille <rai...@mich.com> writes:
>James Coupe wrote:
>> In message <3EE37175...@mich.com>, Raille <rai...@mich.com> writes:
>>
>>>So you saying that Freak drive gets played in sectio 6.2.31?
>>>
>>>Notice that the rules make no mention of ending the action.
>> The rules make no mention of there being a "Before range" phase of
>> combat, either. This is determined by card text, in conjunction with
>> the Golden Rule of Cards.
>
>But there is a point to do pre range.
There's one to do Freak Drive too! It gives you it on the card.
Combat starts, you go into Choose Range.
No wait, Carrion Crows slips in just between combat starting and Choose
Range.
The action resolves and ends.
No wait, Freak Drive slips in between the acting resolving and the end.
That's what card text *does*. Jyhad has lots of card text which defines
phases when things can and can't be played, extra to the 'normal' flow
of things. It can slip in between the phases easily.
Analogously, the rules don't mention that after a bleed is successful,
there is a gap before burning pool for it. But Spying Mission
*provides* that.
There is no rule-book defined "between turns" phase. But Masika gives
you one.
Similarly Freak Drive.
You might find:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=356ADDC5.2781%40wizards.com
helpful, if out of date/anachronistic these days. It's also a good
example of why letting cards define their own steps in simple terms is
helpful - you get unwieldy documents for every single step, otherwise.
(There were several versions of it. That's possibly not the most up to
date, but it's a good example.)
>I've got some issues with my reader. :(
As elsewhere, I'd recommend Gravity or Free/Forte Agent under Windows.
Gravity is very configurable interface wise - almost everyone can find a
setting that suits them. I find Free/Forte Agent a bit... clunky. (I'm
not a fan of the three pane system of reading articles, with previews
and smaller read windows - but Outlook Express seems to be quite popular
doing something similar interface wise.)
Mozilla's reader - which you appear to be using - is competent, without
being note-worthy.
[ quoted text not captured ]