NRA & Madness Network Q

Madness Network is in play My ( Malkavian ) vampire bleeds. In my prey's turn, I play Second Tradition ( with the same vampire ), successfully block and then play Obedience(S) and stay untapped. At the end of my prey's minion phase I am able to take an action, under the NRA am I not allowed to take another bleed action ( i.e. is it still considered the same turn )? Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/

[ quoted text not captured ] No, your prey's turn is not considered your turn. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) VTES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/ [ quoted text not captured ]

In article <95onml$rk8$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote: > gray...@my-deja.com wrote: > > Madness Network is in play > > My ( Malkavian ) vampire bleeds. > > In my prey's turn, I play Second Tradition ( with the same vampire ), > > successfully block and then play Obedience(S) and stay untapped. > > At the end of my prey's minion phase I am able to take an action, > > under the NRA am I not allowed to take another bleed action ( i.e. is > > it still considered the same turn )? > > No, your prey's turn is not considered your turn. Well, obviously :) I guess my question was more about the definition of the term "turn" wrt to the NRA, which you have answered. [ quoted text not captured ]

"Brian Reed" <cap...@austin.rr.com> wrote: > What about Force of Will to bleed with a tapped Malk on some one > else's turn? > Madness Network says "untapped Malkavians" and Force of will says > "Only usable by a tapped vampire". > My playgroup ruled that this is not a valid combo, but I'd like > confirmation please. Madness Network benefits only untapped malkavians, as you say. [ quoted text not captured ]