[LSJ] One More Illusionary Q

In the other thread, it was established that when an illusionary Kindred played Amaranth, the blood Hunt was part of the resolution of the card. The removing from the game comes after the Blood Hunt. A follpw-up Q: can you use the votes the Illusionary Kindred has in the Blood Hunt vote? I don't see why not, but this is really getting a bit silly, innit? Jeroen

[ quoted text not captured ] Yes (and yes :-). -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

>> In the other thread, it was established that when an illusionary Kindred >> played Amaranth, the blood Hunt was part of the resolution of the card. The >> removing from the game comes after the Blood Hunt. >> >> A follpw-up Q: can you use the votes the Illusionary Kindred has in the >> Blood Hunt vote? I don't see why not, but this is really getting a bit >> silly, innit? > > Yes (and yes :-). Heh. Okay...to bring in more serious questions. Say the Illusionary Kindred (henceforth known as "Butros Butros") and the poor sucker that got mixed up in all this (henceforth known as "Bob") trade sucessfully trade aggravated damage. Since Butros Butros would otherwise go to torpor, may he play Amaranth at all? Or can he since, he's not going to torpor, he's just going away? What about Bob? (*snickers* pun fully intended) Can he play Amaranth if he manages to prevent the aggravated damage that these mean, mean Ravnos have inflicted on his poor, innocent...oops, sorry about that...since the opposing vampire isn't really going to torpor? Can he attempt to disbelieve the illusion since, after all, the former Secretary General of the U.N. would certainly not be inflicting aggravated damage upon him? oops. I guess I didn't stick to just serious questions. Regards, Noal

In message <3B7555A3...@none-of-your-fscking-business.com>, Noal McDonald <dhar...@none-of-your-fscking-business.com> writes >Say the Illusionary Kindred (henceforth known as "Butros Butros") and >the poor sucker that got mixed up in all this (henceforth known as >"Bob") trade sucessfully trade aggravated damage. > >Since Butros Butros would otherwise go to torpor, may he play Amaranth >at all? Or can he since, he's not going to torpor, he's just going away? He is, currently, going to torpor. When they hit torpor, the combat ends and IotK text kicks in. >What about Bob? (*snickers* pun fully intended) Can he play Amaranth if >he manages to prevent the aggravated damage that these mean, mean Ravnos >have inflicted on his poor, innocent...oops, sorry about that...since >the opposing vampire isn't really going to torpor? The opposing vampire is going to torpor, so it's legal. Amaranth doesn't care that once he hits torpor, he'll Go Away. >Can he attempt to >disbelieve the illusion since, after all, the former Secretary General >of the U.N. would certainly not be inflicting aggravated damage upon >him? You roll a Will saving throw vs DC 20. Erm.... -- James Coupe PGP Key: 0x5D623D5D EBD690ECD7A1F You scumbag, you maggot, you cheap lousy faggot B457CA213D7E6 Happy Christmas your arse, I pray God it's our last 68C3695D623D5D

Noal McDonald wrote: > Say the Illusionary Kindred (henceforth known as "Butros Butros") and > the poor sucker that got mixed up in all this (henceforth known as > "Bob") trade sucessfully trade aggravated damage. > > Since Butros Butros would otherwise go to torpor, may he play Amaranth > at all? Or can he since, he's not going to torpor, he's just going away? He's "on hiw way to torpor", so he cannot play Amaranth. > What about Bob? (*snickers* pun fully intended) Can he play Amaranth if > he manages to prevent the aggravated damage that these mean, mean Ravnos Yes. [ quoted text not captured ]