LSJ: Ex Nihilo q.

2 messages from 2 participants · 29 June 2001
original thread on Google Groups

Joshua Duffin#

29 June 2001, 17:55

Does "immune to non-aggravated damage" beat "damage cannot be prevented"? This is important to, for example, the Ex Nihilo/Weather Control concept. thanks, Josh the can't think of everything at once prince of washington dc

LSJ#

29 June 2001, 19:17

duff...@bls.gov (Joshua Duffin) wrote: >Does "immune to non-aggravated damage" beat "damage >cannot be prevented"? This is important to, for example, >the Ex Nihilo/Weather Control concept. The two are not at odds, no. The damage is unpreventable and is not prevented. It is then ignored. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/