Anarch revolt stackable?

Can you stack Anarch Revolt so everyone loses multiple pool every turn? I know that Army of Rats damage does not stack. Brian Roberson

In article <S%962.1211$_g.63...@news.rdc1.sfba.home.com>, Umax Boy <Sup...@umax.com> wrote: >Can you stack Anarch Revolt so everyone loses multiple pool every turn? I >know that Army of Rats damage does not stack. Yes. A relatively common deck style. -- /\ Jasper Phillips /VVVVVVVVVVVVVV|~"~"~"~"~"~"----------........____ jaz j^^^^^^^^^^^^^\/"~"~"~"~-----------........._____ ~"~--. * http://www.engr.orst.edu/~philljas/ "~"~'--`

On Mon, 23 Nov 1998, Umax Boy wrote: > Can you stack Anarch Revolt so everyone loses multiple pool every turn? Yes. > I > know that Army of Rats damage does not stack. It has explicit card text to that effect (V:tES version). Lupus Australis ____ ____ \ \----/ / |()__()| __\ __ /__ / __\()/__ \ |/ \==/ \| | || |

Jasper Phillips wrote: > > In article <S%962.1211$_g.63...@news.rdc1.sfba.home.com>, > Umax Boy <Sup...@umax.com> wrote: > >Can you stack Anarch Revolt so everyone loses multiple pool every turn? I > >know that Army of Rats damage does not stack. > > Yes. A relatively common deck style. Correct. -- L. Scott Johnson (vte...@wizards.com) VTES Net.Rep for Wizards of the Coast. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and DCI (tournament) rules: http://www.wizards.com/VTES/VTES_Rules.html

In article <S%962.1211$_g.63...@news.rdc1.sfba.home.com>, "Umax Boy" <Sup...@umax.com> wrote: > Can you stack Anarch Revolt so everyone loses multiple pool every turn? I > know that Army of Rats damage does not stack. Anarch Revolt is cumulative. Army of Rats has a specific clause that states, "You may only burn 1 pool with Army of Rats cards each turn." Anarch Revolt has no such clause. Noal -- "DISCUSSION, n. A method of confirming others in their errors." -Ambrose Bierce. -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

In article <S%962.1211$_g.63...@news.rdc1.sfba.home.com>, "Umax Boy" <Sup...@umax.com> wrote: > Can you stack Anarch Revolt so everyone loses multiple pool every turn? I > know that Army of Rats damage does not stack. Actually, you've probably seen the other posts by now, but you missed a pretty good discussion on this recently...within the last month or two. I can't remember the thread title, but I'd bet it wouldn't be too hard to find on DejaNews... Xian "they look at you funny when you attack things like a hungry mountain lion on crack" --greensea [ quoted text not captured ]

> >> >Can you stack Anarch Revolt so everyone loses multiple pool every turn? > I > >> >know that Army of Rats damage does not stack. > >> > >> Yes. A relatively common deck style. Can you stack Ventrue Directorate Assembly so that each one gives Ventrue 1 more vote? Jake

LSJ wrote in message <365961...@wizards.com>... >Jasper Phillips wrote: >> >> In article <S%962.1211$_g.63...@news.rdc1.sfba.home.com>, >> Umax Boy <Sup...@umax.com> wrote: >> >Can you stack Anarch Revolt so everyone loses multiple pool every turn? I >> >know that Army of Rats damage does not stack. >> >> Yes. A relatively common deck style. > >Correct. And is it possible to Delayed Tactics an action to vote to remove Anarch Revolt? Thanks. Brian Roberson

Umax Boy wrote: > And is it possible to Delayed Tactics an action to vote to remove Anarch > Revolt? Thanks. Yes. The vote to remove Anarch Revolt is a political action, which is all that is required by Delaying Tactics. [ quoted text not captured ]

Jake the Snake <Rus...@mindspring.com> wrote: > Can you stack Ventrue Directorate Assembly so that each one gives Ventrue 1 > more vote? Yes. Card Text. -- L. Scott Johnson (vte...@wizards.com) VTES Net.Rep for Wizards of the Coast. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and DCI (tournament) rules: http://www.wizards.com/VTES/VTES_Rules.html -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- [ quoted text not captured ]