TOM:Q:Purity of theBeast

This has both a inferior and superior use to the card but does not specify a discipline. Our group figures it's meant to be either Protean or Animalism. Can you clarify? Also, the same thing seems to have happened with Summon the Serpent, although it's pretty clear that the ability is meant to be Serpentis. Thanks Tobin -tpl One more thing, I saw an AH list sent out in mailers to DC members and it is missing at least two cards from it, Protect Thine Own & Purity of The Beast.

tob...@fc.hp.com (Tobin Lopes x6486) writes: >This has both a inferior and superior use to the card but does not >specify a discipline. Our group figures it's meant to be either >Protean or Animalism. Can you clarify? Also, the same thing seems to >have happened with Summon the Serpent, although it's pretty clear that >the ability is meant to be Serpentis. They have errata to ignore the superior versions of the cards. (That is, they really are clan-specific cards, with no superior version.) -- L. Scott Johnson (sjoh...@math.sc.edu) | 'I know' is just 'I believe' http://www.math.sc.edu/~sjohnson | with delusions of grandeur. Graphics Specialist and V:tES Rulemonger. |

On 20 Jun 1996 10:18:33 GMT, tob...@fc.hp.com (Tobin Lopes x6486) wrote: >This has both a inferior and superior use to the card but does not >specify a discipline. Our group figures it's meant to be either >Protean or Animalism. Can you clarify? Also, the same thing seems to >have happened with Summon the Serpent, although it's pretty clear that >the ability is meant to be Serpentis. >Thanks >Tobin >-tpl >One more thing, I saw an AH list sent out in mailers to DC members and >it is missing at least two cards from it, Protect Thine Own & Purity >of The Beast. both have errata that they do not use the superior text. Rory The Ref at refplace.best.com