The card can be played as a reaction card. Does this involve being burned
due to a vote? Say if there's a vote burning a vampire in torpor, can you
play Reform Body then? Is it considered a reaction to an action, or a vote?
In message <9f375i$ift$1...@taliesin.netcom.net.uk>, Roger Carhult
<rogc...@student.luth.se> writes
>The card can be played as a reaction card. Does this involve being burned
>due to a vote? Say if there's a vote burning a vampire in torpor, can you
>play Reform Body then? Is it considered a reaction to an action, or a vote?
I can see no reason why not.
Reaction cards can normally be played during (action based) referenda.
The vampire could play Surprise Influence, because there's an action to
react to - and the action is still there as the effect resolves for
things like Voter Captivation.
As to whether it would be considered either a reaction to an action or a
vote, why is the distinction needed? It could be both.
--
James Coupe PGP Key: 0x5D623D5D
"You reinstall Dial-Up Networking. The Elf screams and becomes EBD690ECD7A1F
an icon. *** CONGRATULATIONS! *** You completed the BT Internet B457CA213D7E6
Helpdesk training course in 15 out of a possible 9000 moves." 68C3695D623D5D
James Coupe wrote:
> In message <9f375i$ift$1...@taliesin.netcom.net.uk>, Roger Carhult
> <rogc...@student.luth.se> writes
> >The card can be played as a reaction card. Does this involve being burned
> >due to a vote? Say if there's a vote burning a vampire in torpor, can you
> >play Reform Body then? Is it considered a reaction to an action, or a vote?
>
> I can see no reason why not.
>
> Reaction cards can normally be played during (action based) referenda.
> The vampire could play Surprise Influence, because there's an action to
> react to - and the action is still there as the effect resolves for
> things like Voter Captivation.
>
> As to whether it would be considered either a reaction to an action or a
> vote, why is the distinction needed? It could be both.
Correct.
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/
"LSJ" <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote
> James Coupe wrote:
Roger Carhult> > <rogc...@student.luth.se> writes
> > >The card can be played as a reaction card. Does this involve being
burned
> > >due to a vote? Say if there's a vote burning a vampire in torpor, can
you
> > >play Reform Body then? Is it considered a reaction to an action, or a
vote?
> >
> > I can see no reason why not.
> >
> > Reaction cards can normally be played during (action based) referenda.
> > The vampire could play Surprise Influence, because there's an action to
> > react to - and the action is still there as the effect resolves for
> > things like Voter Captivation.
> >
> > As to whether it would be considered either a reaction to an action or a
> > vote, why is the distinction needed? It could be both.
>
> Correct.
So, would it be correct to say that Reform Body can be used to react
to a diablerie (action), but not to react to the outcome of a blood hunt
that
burns a vampire (6.5.6 states that "reaction cards cannot be played")?
And, if a diablerie can be responded to with Reform Body, is it considered
a successful diablerie (with ensuing equipment steal, blood steal, capacity
increase, and blood hunt)?
- Jason Bell
>
> "LSJ" <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote>> James Coupe wrote:> Roger Carhult> > <rogc...@student.luth.se> writes>>>> The card can be played as a reaction card. Does this involve being> burned>>>> due to a vote? Say if there's a vote burning a vampire in torpor, can> you>>>> play Reform Body then? Is it considered a reaction to an action, or a> vote?>>>
>>> I can see no reason why not.
>>>
>>> Reaction cards can normally be played during (action based) referenda.
>>> The vampire could play Surprise Influence, because there's an action to
>>> react to - and the action is still there as the effect resolves for
>>> things like Voter Captivation.
>>>
>>> As to whether it would be considered either a reaction to an action or a
>>> vote, why is the distinction needed? It could be both.>>
>> Correct.>
> So, would it be correct to say that Reform Body can be used to react
> to a diablerie (action), but not to react to the outcome of a blood hunt
> that
> burns a vampire (6.5.6 states that "reaction cards cannot be played")?
Correct, for the reason you state.
> And, if a diablerie can be responded to with Reform Body, is it considered
> a successful diablerie (with ensuing equipment steal, blood steal, capacity
> increase, and blood hunt)?
Irrelevant, from your own previous correct answer. =)
--
Pat Ricochet
Soul Jar'rn Fool of Atlanta
"You can't make a fact out of an opinion by raising your voice."
>> So, would it be correct to say that Reform Body can be used to react
>> to a diablerie (action), but not to react to the outcome of a blood hunt
>> that
>> burns a vampire (6.5.6 states that "reaction cards cannot be played")?>
> Correct, for the reason you state.
>>> And, if a diablerie can be responded to with Reform Body, is it considered
>> a successful diablerie (with ensuing equipment steal, blood steal, capacity
>> increase, and blood hunt)?>
> Irrelevant, from your own previous correct answer. =)
Whoops! Misread that part, sorry. The diablerie is not considered
successful.
[ quoted text not captured ]
Pat Ricochet wrote:
> >> So, would it be correct to say that Reform Body can be used to react
> >> to a diablerie (action), but not to react to the outcome of a blood hunt
> >> that
> >> burns a vampire (6.5.6 states that "reaction cards cannot be played")?
> >
> > Correct, for the reason you state.
Correct.
> >> And, if a diablerie can be responded to with Reform Body, is it considered
> >> a successful diablerie (with ensuing equipment steal, blood steal, capacity
> >> increase, and blood hunt)?
> >
> > Irrelevant, from your own previous correct answer. =)
>
> Whoops! Misread that part, sorry. The diablerie is not considered
> successful.
Correct.
[ quoted text not captured ]