rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

Twilight Rebellion Distribution Excellent!

11 messages from 9 participants · 29 May 2008 – 02 June 2008
original thread on Google Groups

librarian

I found the Twilight Rebellion distribution to be excellent: 2 boxes opened for sale, and: 3-4 of each rare; 10-12 of each vamp; 23-27 of each common. That's good distribution I would say. best - chris -- Super Fun Cards www.superfuncards.com *NEW Website!* auct...@superfuncards.com

The Lasombra

On Thu, 29 May 2008 11:55:04 -0700, librarian wrote: >I found the Twilight Rebellion distribution to be excellent: I found the distribution to be flat, which is better than excellent. I opened 21 boosters to get the first complete set. There were never less than a complete set in every box I opened (5). There were never 3 of any rare in any of the boxes. I don't think you could ask for better. Thank you Scott. Carpe noctem. Lasombra http://www.TheLasombra.com Your best online source for information about V:TES. Now also featuring individual card sales and sales of booster and starter box displays.

Frederick Scott

"librarian" <auct...@superfuncards.com> wrote in message news:e_C%j.46$TB...@newsfe08.phx... >I found the Twilight Rebellion distribution to be excellent: > > 2 boxes opened for sale, and: > > 3-4 of each rare; 10-12 of each vamp; 23-27 of each common. Eh? How can there be 3-4 of each of 20 rares in a box containing only 36 boosters? New math? Fred (assuming all his assumptions are assumable)

The Lasombra

On Thu, 29 May 2008 16:57:02 -0700, "Frederick Scott" wrote: >>I found the Twilight Rebellion distribution to be excellent: >> 2 boxes opened for sale, and: >> 3-4 of each rare; 10-12 of each vamp; 23-27 of each common. >Eh? How can there be 3-4 of each of 20 rares in a box containing >only 36 boosters? New math? 2 boxes = 36 * 2 = 72 rares 3*20 = 60 1*12=12 60+12=72

LSJ

The Lasombra wrote: > On Thu, 29 May 2008 11:55:04 -0700, librarian wrote: > >> I found the Twilight Rebellion distribution to be excellent: > > I found the distribution to be flat, which is better than excellent. > I opened 21 boosters to get the first complete set. > > There were never less than a complete set in every box I opened (5). > There were never 3 of any rare in any of the boxes. > > I don't think you could ask for better. > > Thank you Scott. Well, you're welcome, but I don't have anything to do with the collation process.

Frederick Scott

"The Lasombra" <TheLa...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:hrgu34psvcpgk1d89...@4ax.com... [ quoted text not captured ] Ah, that was the totals for two boxes, not per box as I leaped to assume for whatever reason. It all makes sense, now. Fred

Peter D Bakija

In article <cLH%j.2072$BK1...@newsfe17.phx>, "Frederick Scott" <nos...@no.spam.dot.com> wrote: > Ah, that was the totals for two boxes, not per box as I leaped > to assume for whatever reason. It all makes sense, now. Just for further distribution analysis: I just opened up half a box (18 boosters). I got: -18 distinct rares (i.e. no duplicates) -About 2-3 of each vampire (I got 1 of a couple and 4 of a few, but mostly 2 or 3) -About 6 of each common (I got 5 of a few, 7 of a few, and 8 of one of them) So almost a full set out of 18 boosters, mostly enough of each common and each vampire (although I sadly only got 2 Anarch Converts, the guy I want, like, 10 of). Very good distribution. Peter D Bakija pd...@lightlink.com http://www.lightlink.com/pdb6/vtes.html "It's too bad she won't live! But then again, who does?" -Gaff

ira...@gmail.com

On May 30, 1:17 pm, Peter D Bakija <p...@lightlink.com> wrote: > (although I sadly only got 2 Anarch Converts, the guy I want, like, 10 of). It's understandable that you'd want so many copies - the guy in the picture is incredibly attractive, smart, and humble. ;) Ira

JH

Opened a box of TR this morning. After opening 6 boosters I had a full set of commons (20/42). One more booster and I had a full set of vampires (20/21). And finally when i had opened 20 boosters I had also a full set of rares (20/20). When I counted all the cards after I noticed that I had 11-14 of each common, 5-6 of each vampire, and 1-2 of each rare. This distribution is almost too perfect to believe.

John Flournoy

[ quoted text not captured ] Opened a box yesterday. 1 or 2 of each rare. 5 or 6 of each vampire. 12, 13 or 14 of each common. -John Flournoy

demonturtle

Yep, it looks pretty good. Out of 18 packs I got 16 different rares, at least 2 of every vamp (3 of the amazing Anarch Converts!!!!), and a pretty even distribution of commons (I mean, I would have liked more Hell For Leathers than Power of Alls, but whaddaya gonna do?). This seems to be one of the best distributions I have experienced (in my case, since Black Hand). This makes me a happy gamer! Cheers, John