Jose Escobedo <jes...@uic.edu> writes:
>I'm assuming it's not but it doesn't say otherwise...
>Can someone clear this this please?
Yes, it is cumulative.
(Because it is written as being cumulative and has no
errata to the contrary).
--
L. Scott Johnson (sjoh...@math.sc.edu) | Surly to bed,
http://www.math.sc.edu/~sjohnson | surly to rise.
Graphics Specialist and V:tES Rulemonger. |