GAWD, my fingers are asleep this morning.
Typo corrections follow (including one major meaning change)
------------------------------------------------------------
sjoh...@math.scarolina.edu (L. Scott Johnson) writes:
>i938...@petra.euitio.uniovi.es (Ignacio Colunga Cantero) writes:
>(editted for correctness, as I interpret the questions)
>> When you <burn a previously played> Major Boon to pass your loss
>> of Pool to another metusaleh, can this last meth. use another
>> major boon to avoid this loss of pool?
>No, because he is not being bled, you are. He is only paying for it.
>> And when a bleed is sucessfull, and two players want to play a
>> major boon, who <gets to play> it first?
>The option to play cards always goes to the acting Meth first, then to
>the blocking Meth (if any), and then to each other Methuselah in turn
>clockwise from the acting Meth.
>In this case (since there is no blocker and the acting Meth cannot
>play a Master: Out-of-turn (ususally)), the order is simply clockwise
"usually", that is.
>from the acting Methuselah.
>> And can the second meth. play his major boon <after> the first?
>No. Major Boon requires your to "Take another Methuselah's blood pool loss
"... requires you to ..."
>due to a bleed" and once the first Boon is played, the Methuselah being
>bled is no longer losing pool. And you can Boon the Meth who played the
"And you *can't* Boon the Meth who played..." (sheez!)
>first Boon, because his pool loss isn't "due to a bleed", it's due to
>a Boon.
--
L. Scott Johnson (sjoh...@math.sc.edu) | Clap on! <clap> <clap>
http://www.math.sc.edu/~sjohnson | Clap off! <clap> <cla+W."
Graphics Specialist and V:tES Rulemonger. | ^Ejq#xe>4NO CARRIER