rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

Question on Mask 1000 faces

6 messages from 5 participants · 13 August 1997 – 24 August 1997
original thread on Google Groups

Gwen Morse

I know there's some sort of special rule attached to this card...something to do with when the reacting vampire can resolve the action and when they can't. But, I can't recall exactly what it is. Situation: A Malkavian player decides to use "Muddled Vampire Hunter"'s special ability (rush) to attack a vampire. A reacting vampire blocks the rush (with intercept). Can the Malkavian Methuselah then play "Mask of 1000 Faces" to have a vampire take over the combat, and if so, WHY? Is it because the instant the reacting vampire blocks, the action changes from the Hunter's special ability to 'just plain combat'? Also, would it matter if the initial rush was not blocked? (Could the Hunter not rush and then change via Mask the moment the combat began?) Gwen Morse

LSJ (VtES Rep)

Gwen Morse wrote: > > I know there's some sort of special rule attached to this > card...something to do with when the reacting vampire can resolve the > action and when they can't. But, I can't recall exactly what it is. > > Situation: > > A Malkavian player decides to use "Muddled Vampire Hunter"'s special > ability (rush) to attack a vampire. A reacting vampire blocks the rush > (with intercept). Can the Malkavian Methuselah then play "Mask of 1000 > Faces" to have a vampire take over the combat, and if so, WHY? No. Mask1K cannot be used to take over a special-ability-action (like Muddles's attack). This is true regardless of whether the action is blocked or not. -- L. Scott Johnson (vte...@regency.wizards.com) Official VtES Net.Rep for Wizards of the Coast. (*) - Subject to review by Rules Team

Shawn A. Hartley

> No. Mask1K cannot be used to take over a special-ability-action (like > Muddles's attack). This is true regardless of whether the action is > blocked or not. > So is this to imply that, for instance, Lucretia can't start an action with her built in +1 Stealth (her special) and have someone else take over that action? Where is the dividing line in what is and what is not a special ability?

LSJ (VtES Rep)

Shawn A. Hartley wrote: > > No. Mask1K cannot be used to take over a special-ability-action (like > > Muddles's attack). This is true regardless of whether the action is > > blocked or not. > > So is this to imply that, for instance, Lucretia can't start an action > with her built in +1 Stealth (her special) and have someone else take > over that action? No. > Where is the dividing line in what is and what is not > a special ability? "special-ability-action" (as stated), not just any "special ability". That line is clear. Lucretia's special ability is not an action at all. Therefore it cannot be masked, since only actions are masked. If Lucretia takes an action (Bum's Rush, Night Moves, Patagia, etc.), then she will have an additional +1 stealth for that action. If someone else Masks the action, then the new vampire continues the action, but doesn't get Lucretia's stealth bonus, since that stealth bonus applies to Lucretia, not to the action in general. [ quoted text not captured ]

Dave Green

What about masking and equipment? Would that fall under the same category as Lucretia's special ability, such that if minion A with a laptop declared a bleed, and then minion B took over the bleed, it would not have the +1 from the laptop? If Lucretia was minion B, would she then lose the +1 bleed from the laptop, but gain an additional +1 stealth from her special ability? I guess that scenario makes the most sense (to me). -Dave Green

James E. Hamblin

[ quoted text not captured ] My answer to this quesion reflects my own confusion with Mo1KF, but here goes. You always go with what the current situation is. If you're bleeding with Lucretia, you get +1 stealth, because Lucretia says you do. If you switch to a different vampire, you lose that bonus. Same deal with the laptop. But let's say Lucretia got superior Dominate. She comes to bleed you for one at +1 stealth. Then she plays Conditioning, coming to bleed you for four at +1 stealth. Then Aggripina (with a laptop) Masks the action. Now you're being bled for five (1 + 3 (Cond.) + 1 (Laptop)), at +1 stealth (0 (base) + 1 (Mask at sup.)). ...even though Aggripina doesn't have Dominate. And, as far as I know, Aggripina could Mask a Govern the Unaligned, but not a Garou's Rush. LSJ? James -- James Hamblin Graduate Student, Department of Mathematics University of Wisconsin -- Madison ham...@math.wisc.edu