haven uncovered

Hi everybody. I have a question about how "haven uncovered" is removed. The card says : Put this card on any ready vampire. Any minion may enter combat with that vampire as a +1 stealth (D) action. ***That vampire can burn this card as a +1 stealth (D) action.*** Does that mean that only the vampire with "haven covered" on it can remove the "haven uncovered" ? And does that mean that no other minion can attempt to block this removal ? If so, why is this action at "+1 stealth" ? If not, why is it a "(D) action" ? Thanks in advance. Jan-Christophe Hoogendoorn.

I just remembered I had another question about "haven uncovered" :) Under the Non Repeated Action rule, can a vampire use a "haven uncovered" to enter combat with a vampire and then a "bum's rush" or a "blood hunt" to do the same thing again ? Can "Wynn" rush a vampire and then use a "haven uncovered" ? Jan-Christophe Hoogendoorn.

In article <8guq94$hi0$1...@news.univ-metz.fr>, "Jan-Christophe Hoogendoorn" <Jan-Christoph...@supelec.fr> wrote: > I have a question about how "haven uncovered" is removed. > The card says : > Put this card on any ready vampire. > Any minion may enter combat with that vampire as a +1 stealth (D) action. > ***That vampire can burn this card as a +1 stealth (D) action.*** > > Does that mean that only the vampire with "haven covered" on it can remove > the "haven uncovered" ? If it specifies that vampire, then, yes, only the vampire with it can remove it as a (D) Action at +1 Stealth. > And does that mean that no other minion can attempt to block this removal ? > If so, why is this action at "+1 stealth" ? > If not, why is it a "(D) action" ? When you perform a (D) Action to burn a card, such as Haven Uncovered, it is always directed at the controlling Methuselah (the player who put it on your vampire). Unless *you* put it on your vampire... in that case, any Directed Action against yourself would become a regular action magically. Opponents can still attempt to block it, so you'll appreciate the inherent +1 Stealth. -t!MmY Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.

"Jan-Christophe Hoogendoorn" <Jan-Christoph...@supelec.fr> wrote: [ quoted text not captured ] Yes. Since "enter combat" is not one of the defined action types, each of those actions is a separate type. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) VTES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/ [ quoted text not captured ]