rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

Wave of Insanity vs. React With Conviction

2 messages from 2 participants · 18 April 2006
original thread on Google Groups

witness1

Is superior Wave of Insanity considered directed at any given ally even if the action itself is undirected (i.e., the targets are controlled by more than one methuselah)? Can a single React With Conviction cause the entire action to fail in this case? What if all the allies in play are controlled by the same player? Witness1 -ItE

LSJ

witness1 wrote: > Is superior Wave of Insanity considered directed at any given ally even > if the action itself is undirected (i.e., the targets are controlled by > more than one methuselah)? No. An undirected action does not qualify as a "(D) action against this imbued". > Can a single React With Conviction cause the entire action to fail in > this case? > What if all the allies in play are controlled by the same player? Then the action would be a (D) action, and RwC could be used (to cancel the action as it is announced).