minor question:slave&CI

my guess is that if Saxum changes to a ventrue via Clan Impersonation, he still retains being a tremere slave due to card text. most things work that way, but assamites lose the blood curse if they CI any other clan. i think this is because it's actually listed in the rulebook (6.5.5) that the condition is clan-based. and many times, the bloodlines Additional Rules for VTES implies that only gargoyles can be slaves (3.9) making that condition clan-based as well. And the question... UH... howzitgo? thanks, sppiiinnnnnneyyyyeyyeyyeyeyyyeyeyeeeyyy ($6 apportation? and i'm not selling... Mariel told me not to....) "the blood of these whores is killing me"..v-v.. andy warhol's dracula

spinney99 wrote: > > my guess is that if Saxum changes to a ventrue via Clan Impersonation, > he still retains being a tremere slave due to card text. Correct. > most things > work that way, but assamites lose the blood curse if they CI any other > clan. i think this is because it's actually listed in the rulebook > (6.5.5) that the condition is clan-based. Correct. > and many times, the > bloodlines Additional Rules for VTES implies that only gargoyles can > be slaves (3.9) making that condition clan-based as well. And the > question... UH... howzitgo? Only Gargoyles get to interpose for their masters. But slave vampires are limited to undirected action without their masters. Per BL 3.9 -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/