In article <3nniah$t...@hermes.acs.ryerson.ca>,
Donald Mosley - JOUN/F94 <dmo...@acs.ryerson.ca> wrote:
>I've got a question about the Auspex card Read Intentions...
>
>The superior text for this card simply says "dodge". I assume this is
>errata, and it's supposed to be "strike: dodge", cause if it's not this
>card is way too powerful.
All strikes are dodges, even if a card forgets to say so.
--
-----
L. Scott Johnson (lsc...@crl.com)
Graphics Specialist and Jyhad Rules' Monger
I've got a question about the Auspex card Read Intentions...
The superior text for this card simply says "dodge". I assume this is
errata, and it's supposed to be "strike: dodge", cause if it's not this
card is way too powerful.
"You played a concealed weapon and brought out the Ivory Bow, and I'm
already commited to strike with hands? No problem, I strike, then dodge."
In article <3nqh8o$o...@hermes.acs.ryerson.ca>,
Donald Mosley - JOUN/F94 <dmo...@acs.ryerson.ca> wrote:
>L. Scott Johnson (lsc...@crl.com) wrote:
>: In article <3nniah$t...@hermes.acs.ryerson.ca>,>: Donald Mosley - JOUN/F94 <dmo...@acs.ryerson.ca> wrote:>: >I've got a question about the Auspex card Read Intentions...>: >
>: >The superior text for this card simply says "dodge". I assume this is
>: >errata, and it's supposed to be "strike: dodge", cause if it's not this
>: >card is way too powerful.
>>: All strikes are dodges, even if a card forgets to say so.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Guess I better scrap my rush combat deck, I'll never be able to hit
>anybody. :)
Wise guy :-).
All dodges are strikes. <sheepish grin>
>
>Given that opinion on this one has been split evenly, I'll wait for Tom
>to rule on it.
DTR 11/9/94:
>Dodges are always strikes, even if a card forgets to say so.
From: aa...@cats.ucsc.edu (Thomas R Wylie)
Subject: Re: More questions folks !!!
Date: 22 Jan 1995 05:44:14 GMT
>>6. With Crushers dodge - this is his strike for the round, right ? He
>>doesn't get to dodge the damage and shoot you too ?{>
>Yes. All dodges are strikes, even if a card forgets to say so.
--
-----
L. Scott Johnson (lsc...@crl.com)
Graphics Specialist and Jyhad Rulemonger
L. Scott Johnson (lsc...@crl.com) wrote:
: In article <3nniah$t...@hermes.acs.ryerson.ca>,
: Donald Mosley - JOUN/F94 <dmo...@acs.ryerson.ca> wrote:
: >I've got a question about the Auspex card Read Intentions...
: >
: >The superior text for this card simply says "dodge". I assume this is
: >errata, and it's supposed to be "strike: dodge", cause if it's not this
: >card is way too powerful.: All strikes are dodges, even if a card forgets to say so.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Guess I better scrap my rush combat deck, I'll never be able to hit
anybody. :)
Given that opinion on this one has been split evenly, I'll wait for Tom
to rule on it.
dmo...@acs.ryerson.ca (Donald Mosley - JOUN/F94) wrote:
>
> L. Scott Johnson (lsc...@crl.com) wrote:
> : In article <3nniah$t...@hermes.acs.ryerson.ca>,
> : Donald Mosley - JOUN/F94 <dmo...@acs.ryerson.ca> wrote:
> : >I've got a question about the Auspex card Read Intentions...
> : >
> : >The superior text for this card simply says "dodge". I assume this is
> : >errata, and it's supposed to be "strike: dodge", cause if it's not this
> : >card is way too powerful.
>
> : All strikes are dodges, even if a card forgets to say so.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Peace Donald,
> Guess I better scrap my rush combat deck, I'll never be able to hit
> anybody. :)
Right, can I have all your Fists of Death then?
> Given that opinion on this one has been split evenly, I'll wait for Tom
> to rule on it.
It has already been ruled on, Donald. All cards that say "Dodge" should
say "Strike: Dodge." This is official; I'm not bullshitting you and neither
is Scott [he knows what he's talking about (except for the (D) bleed thing 8^) )].
Nil carborundum illigitimi,
James R. McClure Jr.
The OS/2 Apostle
<insert disclaimer here>