Re: [LSJ] Rowan Ring and King of the Mountain

"ThE_OnLy_VipeR" <fina...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:576ea13a.04111...@posting.google.com... > my question is the next, let's say that i play a king of the mountain > in basic against an oposing minion bearing the rowan ring, now he > strikes me, now the rowan ring is destroyed beacause is a melee > weapon, but my vampire goes to torpor or not? If your opponent selects "Rowan Ring" as his strike, you cannot play King of the Mountain, because there is no damage to prevent. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. V:TES homepage: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/ Though effective, appear to be ineffective -- Sun Tzu

> > my question is the next, let's say that i play a king of the mountain > > in basic against an oposing minion bearing the rowan ring, now he > > strikes me, now the rowan ring is destroyed beacause is a melee > > weapon, but my vampire goes to torpor or not? > > If your opponent selects "Rowan Ring" as his strike, you cannot play King > of the Mountain, because there is no damage to prevent. doesn't "all" refer also to 0? I can agree, that you cannot play prevent X damage card, but why not prevent all damage, even if there's no damage? sinaath

"sinaath" <sin...@kill.this.gmail.com> wrote in message news:cn9pr9$1aej$1...@news2.ipartners.pl... [ quoted text not captured ] Because it is a damage prevention effect, and damage prevention effects cannot be played if there is no damage to prevent. [ quoted text not captured ]