Legacy of Pander

LSJ wrote: > > Recently, on either the newsgroup or the mailing list (or both), > I made a ruling that Legacy of Pander is not cumulative. > > I based this ruling on the Legacy of Pander's card text > as listed on the WotC web page: > > If this vote is successful, put this card in play. Each non-titled > Pander has one vote. This card may be burned by a vote called by any > Sabbat vampire as a (D) action. > > This text is produces a non-cumulative effect. However, I have been > informed by R. David Zopf that the actual card text is > > If this vote is successful, put this card in play. Each non-titled > Pander has one additional vote. This card may be burned by a vote > called by any Sabbat vampire as a +1 stealth action. > > This text produces a cumulative effect. So, if this latter text is > correct (and I have no reason to doubt David - I'm just emphasizing > that I'm not able to verify the card text myself), then Legacy of > Pander is cumulative. > > Sorry for the confusion. > > -- > L. Scott Johnson (vte...@wizards.com) > Official VtES Net.Rep for Wizards of the Coast. > (*) - Subject to review by Rules Team So which is it? The +1 or the 1 vote version that is official. Can you get WotC to modify their web page if it is wrong? -- ---------------------------------------------------------- Life is Good thanks to God Quicksilver <michae...@lmco.com>

Quicksilver <michae...@lmco.com> wrote: >So which is it? The +1 or the 1 vote version that is official. Can >you get WotC to modify their web page if it is wrong? >-- LSJ is encouraging everyone to check their own copies of the card, to verify if I'm right or wrong, and apply the ruling that corresponds to the correct card text. As to getting WotC to correct V:tES card text errors in their web page, anyone's time would be better spent developing a hernia in imitation of the art on "Well aimed Car". At least then you'll have some interesting surgical scars to show for your efforts... Regards, Crusade: Boston R. David Zopf A DCI sanctioned V:tES tournament Creature of the night chemist Saturday, Nov. 1st, 1997

Quicksilver <michae...@lmco.com> wrote: > LSJ wrote: > > Recently, on either the newsgroup or the mailing list (or both), > > I made a ruling that Legacy of Pander is not cumulative. > > > > [The card text as given on the WotC site has a non-cumulative effect] > > However, I have been informed by R. David Zopf that > > [The actual card text is written so as to be cumulative]. > > > > So, if this latter text is > > correct (and I have no reason to doubt David - I'm just emphasizing > > that I'm not able to verify the card text myself), then Legacy of > > Pander is cumulative. > > So which is it? The +1 or the 1 vote version that is official. Can > you get WotC to modify their web page if it is wrong? It is whichever way the card is printed. No errata has been issued, so card text stands. If (for JOL), you have no method of checking card text, then go with WotC's spoiler list. Sorry, that's the best I can do. As for changing the WotC list if it is wrong, I'll add this correction to the list. But the list has been around for a while now, and no corrections have made it through "the process". Do not lose hope, however. "The process" has just managed to replaced the archaic "Reversal of Fortunes" edition of the FAQ with the Oct. 1, 1997 version of the Rulings Summary (apparently culled from the VTES-L list, judging by the last line of the page): http://www.wizards.com/VTES/VTES_Rulings.txt -- L. Scott Johnson (vte...@wizards.com) Official VtES Net.Rep for Wizards of the Coast. (*) - Subject to review by Rules Team -------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====----------------------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet