LSJ: Nails

Just to be on the safe side, is Nails really group-4 or it's a misprint? I mean, it looks suspicious, 19 group-5 vamps and then him.

Alias wrote: > Just to be on the safe side, is Nails really group-4 or it's a > misprint? No misprint.

[ quoted text not captured ] I believe the reason is that !nos got no black hand vampires in 3rd.

[ quoted text not captured ] of course I don't complain, I was just little paranoid about the "first edition without misprints" stuff :) I am already reanimating my Teresita deck :)

On Mar 22, 12:35 am, "Alias" <ransom.st...@seznam.cz> wrote: > Just to be on the safe side, is Nails really group-4 or it's a > misprint? I mean, it looks suspicious, 19 group-5 vamps and then him. Kestrelle is group 4 as well. Nat

> Kestrelle is group 4 as well. > Nat ummmm, nevermind. Pay no attention to the crazy guy in the corner. Apparently the new Fragment of Elder Library has her listed as a group 4. Perhaps I should stop trusting that thing since it can't seem to be put out error free. Nat

[ quoted text not captured ] FELDB has one serious problem: the database is updated manually. It's much easier to keep the program error free if one updates the database directly from the WW's card text files. This of course could require some manual inputting depending on the database used with the program in question.

[ quoted text not captured ] Wasn't Kestrelle the vamp that got printed as a promo as group 4 (thus, briefly, FELDB would be correct), and then when the set was released it was noticed she was group 5 in that set (or before hand, i am not sure of the timing), and LSJ issued errata to the promo version to correct her group to 5? or was that some other vampire? -- salem (replace 'hotmail' with 'yahoo' to email)