TWD: Tatoo Signal - April 21st, 2007 - Montreal

Tatoo Signal April 21st, 2007 16 players Face à Face, Montréal Final ranking: 1 Marc Desaulniers 3 11,5 2 Yan Arseneault 2 8 3 Francois Deschamplain 1 5,5 4 Kevin Mclean 2 7 5 Christian Marinelli 1 4 6 Marc Durand 1 3,5 7 Kosta Agridiotis 0 2 8 Jean-Yves Lapointe 0 1 9 Roxanne Blouin-Payer 0 0,5 10 Gabrielle Garand 0 0,5 11 Jean-Francois Houle 0 0 12 Ethienne Liblanc 0 0 13 Martin Poliquin 0 0 13 Marc Lussier 0 0 15 Yan Beauchamp 0 0 DQ Richard Blais 1 4 Winning deck: Deck Name: B2B (Back to Basics) Created By: Marc Desaulniers - Fouez Crypt: (13 cards, Min: 16, Max: 40, Avg: 7) ------------------------------------------- 1 Ohanna dom 2 Malkavian 1 Normal obf 2 Malkavian 1 Didi Meyers aus cel obf DOM 5 Malkavian 3 Greger Anderssen dom pro AUS OBF 7 Malkavian 3 Gilbert Duane AUS DOM OBF 7 Malkavian 4 Lucian cel tha AUS DOM OBF10 Malkavian Library: (90 cards) ------------------- Master (16 cards) 1 Anarch Troublemaker 6 Blood Doll 1 Elysium: The Arboretum 1 From a Sinking Ship 1 Giant`s Blood 1 Golconda: Inner Peace 1 Pentex Subversion 1 Rack, The 2 Sudden Reversal 1 Temptation of Greater Power Action (10 cards) 1 Dominate Kine 7 Govern the Unaligned 2 Pulse of the Canaille Action Modifier (17 cards) 3 Cloak the Gathering 3 Conditioning 3 Faceless Night 5 Lost in Crowds 3 Seduction Political Action (6 cards) 2 Banishment 4 Parity Shift Reaction (30 cards) 5 Deflection 2 Malkavian Rider Clause 10 Obedience 9 Second Tradition: Domain, The 4 Wake with Evening`s Freshness Combat (3 cards) 3 Aura Reading Equipment (5 cards) 1 Bowl of Convergence 1 Heart of Nizchetus 3 Sniper Rifle Combo (3 cards) 3 Swallowed by the Night

No malkavian Network ? O_O Why?

On 23 avr, 06:31, Huruem <Huruem_cate...@hotmail.com> wrote: > No malkavian Network ? O_O > > Why? I already have a Network deck with Rachel and I find this concept far less interesting without the protean/Homonculus part. Someone on our forum said that there was nothing good to do with gr. 1-2 Malks besides pure B/S... so I had to try ;)

[ quoted text not captured ] I don't know, at least I would have put one in the deck, just in case nobody tries to burn it. And I mean with 10 obedience and 9 second tradition you can definetly defend it for a while.

Fouez <fo...@aei.ca> wrote in news:1177279618.073324.157180 @y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com: > Tatoo Signal > April 21st, 2007 > 16 players > Face à Face, Montréal > > Final ranking: > > DQ Richard Blais 1 4 > ...Dare i even ask? DZ AW

On Apr 23, 4:40 pm, atomweaver <atomwea...@spamtrap.com> wrote: > Fouez <f...@aei.ca> wrote in news:1177279618.073324.157180 [ quoted text not captured ] I hear it was due to a 5.5 Enjoyment of Game infraction in Round 2. "5.5 Enjoyment of Game Players must take their turns with minimal enjoyment. Whereas taking a reasonable amount of enjoyment from the game is acceptable, mirth or merriment that detracts from sport-game competitiveness is prohibited. If a judge determines that a player is engaging in excess enjoyment of game, or is competing in an inappropriately relaxed manner, the responsible player will be subject to the appropriate provisions of the V:EKN Penalty Guidelines."

On 23 avr, 19:40, atomweaver <atomwea...@spamtrap.com> wrote: > Fouez <f...@aei.ca> wrote in news:1177279618.073324.157180 [ quoted text not captured ] Richard was in 5th place after the preliminary rounds. He had something else planned and decided to withdraw himself from the final table. The player ranked 6th took his place. She's very cute apparently... Fouez

[ quoted text not captured ] Yeah, 2 Madness Network could very well replace the 2 Sudden Reversals.

Fouez <fo...@aei.ca> wrote in news:1177375666.190121.151290 @q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com: [ quoted text not captured ] Oh, cool. But for the record (the one submitted with the tournament results ;-) that would be a withdrawal, not a DQ... Thanks DaveZ Atom Weaver

atomweaver wrote: > Oh, cool. But for the record (the one submitted with the tournament > results ;-) that would be a withdrawal, not a DQ... For the record, the Archon displays any "not available for the finals" result as "DQ" -- disqualified from the finals' table computation.

LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote in news:ncnXh.557$RX....@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net: > atomweaver wrote: > For the record, the Archon displays any "not available for the finals" > result as "DQ" -- disqualified from the finals' table computation. > Ah, right right... Thanks Scott. DZ AW