sniper rifle against terror frenzy

Is this an allowable sequence? Vampire A (with ANI) attempts an action and get blocked by Vampire B with a sniper rifle. Vampire A has Terror frenzy in his hand. Vampire A, because he is acting, declares first. He declares "no pre-range". Vampire B responds with setting range to long with sniper rifle (this is a pre-range declaration). Now since Meth B declared something, Meth A can now respond with Terror Frenzy? If so, I assume the result is default long range but since Meth B declared use of sniper rifle (which he cannot use now due to TF) he gets no strike. (But could get additional strikes of course)

<adam....@ngc.com> wrote in message news:1112123844.7...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > Is this an allowable sequence? > > Vampire A (with ANI) attempts an action and get blocked by Vampire B > with a sniper rifle. Vampire A has Terror frenzy in his hand. > > Vampire A, because he is acting, declares first. He declares "no > pre-range". > > Vampire B responds with setting range to long with sniper rifle (this > is a pre-range declaration). > > Now since Meth B declared something, Meth A can now respond with Terror > Frenzy? Yes. > If so, I assume the result is default long range but since Meth B > declared use of sniper rifle (which he cannot use now due to TF) he > gets no strike. (But could get additional strikes of course) Correct. -- LSJ (vtesr...@TRAPwhite-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep (Remove spam trap to reply). V:TES homepage: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/ Though effective, appear to be ineffective -- Sun Tzu