You know what pisses me off!

When all the messages that seem like they are goping to be informative in here are just plugs for web pages. Why can't someone request a list of the new cards from VTES and not have replies like, why don't you read my message (in reply to that, YOUR MESSAGE IS GONE. IT GOT SCROLLED AWAY), and like "Check out my We page, here's the address. Well, why am I bitching? Because I wanted a list of whats in and whats out, and I don't want to hear this crap, I just want someone to send me a list. Thanks... Reven...@AOL.com

In article <49njm0$p...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, [ quoted text not captured ] Sure: In: World Wide Web Out: Bitching about receiving replies that aren't to your liking, when you didn't specify "please e-mail me a complete list since I can't use the WWW, thanks" (Ok, so it's the short list :-) If people go through the time and trouble of creating a useful web page, then why clutter the (overloaded) internet bandwidth by broad-posting information to the usenet? "Check my webpage" uses a lot less bandwidth than a complete list. (I will here defend my practice of posting errata summaries and so forth as a preventative step to reduce the number of times that the same questions are asked over and over - not that it always works) If anyone would rather I stop posting these (lengthy) messages, I will be content to leave them be on my jyhad page: http://www.math.sc.edu/~sjohnson/jyhad Just send me e-mail asking that I cease and desist. -- ----- L. Scott Johnson (lsc...@crl.com) | The opinions expressed are mine Graphics Specialist and V:tES Rulemonger | and subject to card text

In article <49uv85$o...@crl.crl.com>, lsc...@crl.com (L. Scott Johnson) wrote: > In article <49njm0$p...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, > RevengeBBS <reven...@aol.com> wrote: > >Well, why am I bitching? Because I wanted a list of whats in and whats > >out, and I don't want to hear this crap, I just want someone to send me a > >list. Thanks... > > Sure: > > In: World Wide Web > Out: Bitching about receiving replies that aren't to your liking, when > you didn't specify "please e-mail me a complete list since I can't use > the WWW, thanks" > > (Ok, so it's the short list :-) > > If people go through the time and trouble of creating a useful web page, > then why clutter the (overloaded) internet bandwidth by broad-posting > information to the usenet? > > "Check my webpage" uses a lot less bandwidth than a complete list. Here's why: 1) Usenet is not interactive, and therefore people who dial up for their connection don't need to pay the 'phone company all the time they're reading 2) Usenet extends beyond the TCP-IP parts of Internet (beyond firewall machines and such, as well as into countries that don't have TCP-IP access) and is therefore available to many users who cannot use Web 3) Usenet is held locally, so users who are a long way away can still use it (have you ever tried to download a web page on another continent, when Netscape is showing 86 characters a second, and the telephone company is charging about the same?) > http://www.math.sc.edu/~sjohnson/jyhad > > Just send me e-mail asking that I cease and desist. Please *don't*. An .edu site will not be available from here except between 2:00 and 8:00 GMT, due to transatlantic traffic - and I like my sleep. Simon --- "This too is meaningless, a chasing after the wind" -Ecclesiastes 4:16 si...@onechip.co.uk | Not affiliated to any religion | Not affiliated to any politics H (+44/0)1784 431998 | Not affiliated to any ideology W (+44/0)1784 434568 (GMT/BST) | What does that make me? "I have been asked to point out, as if you couldn't guess, that my rantings are not the opinions of One Chip Solutions. So now you know, don't you..?"