Ok, here's my question: is it possible to use blur, take the first two attacks
and then use Majesty to end combat and untap? Well, I mean I know you can, but
do the first two attacks cause damage? I know Combat ends cancels everything
and 'retroactively' cancels strikes but the reasoni
i'm asking is that the damage frome
the first two attacks has already been resolved. Oh, by the way, sorry
for the formatting.
eryn
.
In article <3n0el9$5...@nada.cs.utexas.edu>, gab...@cs.utexas.edu (Eryn
Gabriel Surprenant) wrote:
[ quoted text not captured ]
Howdy Eryn,
Just thought I would give an answer to this one. (as you are joining my
group, it might be nice for you to see how we think:-) )
Combat ends stops combat immediately, however, I believe that the 2
previous strikes will lnad. My reasoning is as follows. There will be
the original strikes of the normal combat, these will be resolved in the
first strike resolution phase (assuming no one else plays a combat ends).
Then you would play the Blur at superior allowing 2 additional strikes,
the other vamp would either have additional strikes or not. Eack
additional strike has it's own strike resolution phase. So your first
additional strike would be resolved before you chose your second
additional strike. Thus, you could choose to majesty for your second
additional strike and untap, assuming the superior (and I really can't
think of a reason to play Majesty at that point without the superior
unless trying to avoid the second additional strike from the opposing
vamp.)
This is my take on the situation. Each additional strike has it's own
strike resolution phase. So, if the opposing minion played an additional
strike card and did aggravated damage to you in the first strike
resolution phase, you would go to torpor and lose the second of your
additional strikes.
hope this helped
see you this weekend
stephen
In article <3n0el9$5...@nada.cs.utexas.edu>,
Eryn Gabriel Surprenant <gab...@cs.utexas.edu> wrote:
>Ok, here's my question: is it possible to use blur, take the first two attacks
>and then use Majesty to end combat and untap? Well, I mean I know you can, but
>do the first two attacks cause damage? I know Combat ends cancels everything
>and 'retroactively' cancels strikes but the reasoni
Combat ends never does anything retroactive. Combat ends is
more of a preemptive thing rather than a retroactive thing. Once it's
down, we're done, but before then, you can do what you want. So the
opposing vampire would still be damaged.
| If you've got a hot lead on a new | *--Joe--*
| PC game, call the announce line at | js...@vt.edu
| ** csi...@discus.ise.vt.edu ** |
+-------------------------------------+----------------------------------
"Carnivores, oy!" -- Timon, TLK
gab...@cs.utexas.edu (Eryn Gabriel Surprenant) writes:
>Ok, here's my question: is it possible to use blur, take the first two attacks
>and then use Majesty to end combat and untap? Well, I mean I know you can, but
>do the first two attacks cause damage? I know Combat ends cancels everything
>and 'retroactively' cancels strikes but the reasoni>i'm asking is that the damage frome
> the first two attacks has already been resolved. Oh, by the way, sorry
>for the formatting.
Combat ends (officially) ends combat at the same time that it is declared
- before the declared attacks begin to resolve.
If you blur, then you will not declare that the combat is ending until
the first two attack steps have been declared and have resolved.
Your opponent's first declared strike would resolve normally
(as would her second, if she gained additional strikes, too).
At the point you declare a Strike: End Combat, combat ends.
It will not retro previous strikes that round.
(the outline posted here yesterday would clear this point up as well).
-----
L. Scott Johnson (sjoh...@math.scarolina.edu)
Graphics Specialist and Jyhad Rules Monger.
>Ok, here's my question: is it possible to use blur, take the first two
attacks
>and then use Majesty to end combat and untap? Well, I mean I know you
can, but
>do the first two attacks cause damage? I know Combat ends cancels
everything
>and 'retroactively' cancels strikes but the reasoni
>i'm asking is that the damage frome
> the first two attacks has already been resolved. Oh, by the way, sorry
>for the formatting.
No they wouldn't the combat would be ended before the damage dealing
phase.
--
Guy Swartwood tyrell.net
gswa...@msgateway.wichitaks.attgis.com
____________________________________________________________________
"I maybe an idiot, but indeed I am no fool." Men at Work
"My skin is cold to the human touch" Pink FLoyd
"You don't know feels it to be me" Tom Petty