curious ruling

When taking the action to burn a location, the action will fail if the acting minion does not possess the bomb when the action resolves (after being Masked, or if the Bomb was transferred or destroyed somehow). [RTR 19960221] Another minion really cannot play mask on a bemb-destroy action, right, making part of above ruling obsolete. What if two minions both have a bomb? Can they then mask back and forth, or is it the same case as, for example, beast and theo bells rush actions? /Henrik Isaksson

Henrik Isaksson wrote: > > When taking the action to burn a location, the action will fail if the acting minion does not > possess the bomb when the action resolves (after being Masked, or if the Bomb was transferred or > destroyed somehow). [RTR 19960221] > > Another minion really cannot play mask on a bemb-destroy action, right, making part of above ruling > obsolete. Right. > What if two minions both have a bomb? Can they then mask back and forth, or is it the same > case as, for example, beast and theo bells rush actions? The latter. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

Henrik Isaksson wrote: > Another minion really cannot play mask on a bemb-destroy action, right, > making part of above ruling obsolete. What if two minions both have a bomb? > Can they then mask back and forth, or is it the same case as, for example, > beast and theo bells rush actions? Even if it works the way you hope it works, Bomb is still not good. :) - Ben Peal, Prince of Boston fu...@mindstorm.com

Ben Peal wrote: > Henrik Isaksson wrote: >> Another minion really cannot play mask on a bemb-destroy action, >> right, making part of above ruling obsolete. What if two minions >> both have a bomb? Can they then mask back and forth, or is it the >> same case as, for example, beast and theo bells rush actions? > > Even if it works the way you hope it works, Bomb is still not > good. i know what you may think but i played a bomb deck with mucho success in the past. basically it was a !gangrel deck. computer hack, if blocked play flesh of marble. dodge for your first strike, then blur, strike with disguised weapon bomb for 5 damage, strike with another disguised weapon for 5 damage, laugh loudly. it was pretty funny to play with this ! requires only 10 flesh of marble and 10 bombs. did i mention i even burned a location once ?? =)

"reyda" <true_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<3d93a6e1$0$13195$79c1...@nan-newsreader-01.noos.net>... [ quoted text not captured ] Hmmm, do you still have the deck-list? i would LOVE to feature this in the October !Gangrel NL.

> Hmmm, do you still have the deck-list? i would LOVE to feature this in > the October !Gangrel NL. Nasty !

legbiter wrote: > "reyda" <true_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> basically it was a !gangrel deck. computer hack, if blocked play >> flesh of marble. dodge for your first strike, then blur, strike >> with disguised weapon bomb for 5 damage, strike with another >> disguised weapon for 5 damage, laugh loudly. >> it was pretty funny to play with this ! requires only 10 flesh of >> marble and 10 bombs. did i mention i even burned a location once >> ?? =) > > Hmmm, do you still have the deck-list? i would LOVE to feature this > in the October !Gangrel NL. the deck is dismantled bu i'll do it again especially for you =) reyda

[ quoted text not captured ] Why pay 1 blood for Wolf Claws when you can pay 1 pool to cause them to play S:CE instead? ;) The deck does sound like a lot of fun, though. :) [ quoted text not captured ]

Ben Peal wrote: [ quoted text not captured ] you forgot the mighty psyche =)