rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

gencon and qualifier questions

7 messages from 4 participants · 24 July 2007 – 25 July 2007
original thread on Google Groups

ShunnedOne

1. Why are the two US championship events at gencon scheduled for Friday and Saturday instead of Saturday and Sunday which was the way it was done in the past? 2. Is the constructed portion of the championship considered a qualifer for the NAC? 3. What qualifiers are there between now and the NAC? Thanks!

LSJ

ShunnedOne wrote: > 1. Why are the two US championship events at gencon scheduled for Friday and > Saturday instead of Saturday and Sunday which was the way it was done in the > past? To avoid having finalists forced to bow out in order to catch a plane (and otherwise avoid the mad crunch that occurs on Sunday). > 2. Is the constructed portion of the championship considered a qualifer for > the NAC? No. > 3. What qualifiers are there between now and the NAC? http://www.white-wolf.com/events/search.php

ShunnedOne

Thanks. One last question -- the "scattershot" event was listed as being on Saturday, the "19th" but the 19th is Sunday (and the second US nationals are on saturday). So, I assume it's really supposed to be on Sunday?

John Flournoy

On Jul 24, 5:36 am, LSJ <vtes...@white-wolf.com> wrote: > ShunnedOne wrote: > > 2. Is the constructed portion of the championship considered a qualifer for > > the NAC? > > No. Really? The Constructed has been publicized as a qualifier already (and if memory serves, it was a Q last year): TCG00190 US Nationals II Sanction constructed. Qualifier for the North American Continental Championship. 3R+F, and results used in crowning the US champion. Total GWs from both I and II (including the finals) determine the champion. Ties broken by using the just GWs from the two finals, then by total VPs, then by final VPs. TCG - Tradable Card Game 8 Saturday 2007-08-18 10:00:00 (cut'n'pasted from Jeff's cut'n'pasting a week ago from the Gen Con event listing website, http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad/msg/cf27c1e687da75fb?hl=en& ) -John Flournoy

LSJ

John Flournoy wrote: > On Jul 24, 5:36 am, LSJ <vtes...@white-wolf.com> wrote: >> ShunnedOne wrote: > >>> 2. Is the constructed portion of the championship considered a qualifer for >>> the NAC? >> No. > > Really? The Constructed has been publicized as a qualifier already And now you know why I let Oscar answer these questions.

John Flournoy

[ quoted text not captured ] I'm told that knowing is a moderately-sized fraction of 'the battle'. -John Flournoy

CthuluKitty

> > >John: > > > Really? The Constructed has been publicized as a qualifier already > >LSJ: > > And now you know why I let Oscar answer these questions. >John again: > I'm told that knowing is a moderately-sized fraction of 'the battle'. > > -John Flournoy Now let us spill (our drinks upon) the Blood of the Cobra (because it is totally worthless).