rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

Question: Vitae Block + Punish

7 messages from 5 participants · 23 February 2007
original thread on Google Groups

tongu...@comcast.net

I'm building a Salubri/Imbued deck that wants to use Vitae Block with the Redemption card Punish. As it is late where I am, and looking at the wording on both cards I think I'm right. But I still wanted to ask. Vitae Block Type: Combat Play before range is determined. Only usable if the opposing minion is a vampire. A vampire can play only one Vitae Block each combat. [obe] Put this card in play and move up to 2 blood from the opposing vampire to this card. During your untap phase, return the blood counters to that vampire and burn this card. Punish Type: Action / Combat Requires: Redemption [ACTION] +1 stealth action. (D) Put this card on a vampire. You still control this card. The vampire with this card cannot gain blood. Any blood he or she gains goes to the blood bank instead. Burn this card during your next untap phase. [COMBAT] As [ACTION] above, but put this card on the opposing vampire as a hand strike (at strength damage) instead. Is "returning" the blood from VB technically the same as gaining blood for all intents and purposes from Punish? If so then cool beans, if not then I should put a halt to my deck ideas for the time being. I did a search for vitae block and found a thread asking about it with blood clots, and someone basically said returning and gained are the same. But I would still like to ask. And if it is true, each card has a "during your next untap, burn this card." I would get to choose which to burn first I imagine. Seeing how they are both my cards and would burn at the same time. Thank you!

Bram Vink

[ quoted text not captured ] I would assume the following reasoning: --- A vampire has X blood. Effect Y A vampire has more than X blood. Effect Y = Gaining Blood. --- If the ending of vitae block's effect would not be considered gaining blood, then X in the previous example would have to be unaltered by the playing of vitae block to begin with. ie. I play vitae block, and the opposing vampire still has X blood, there's just 3 of it on this card. This is not how the card works. You lose the blood, then regain it. (playing it can trigger anathema, for example.) Hope that's sufficiently clear, B

Bram Vink

Just to clarify what I mean: Since at the initial playing of Vitae Block you lose blood, you gain blood when you get it back. If you wouldn't gain blood when having your blood returned, you wouldn't lose it in the first place, and count as having said blood. This is not the case. Cheers, B

adam....@gmail.com

That is an aweome combo. I was thinking about doing an imbued-salubri deck too. Since Obeah has all those ally cards...

niko.p....@gmail.com

[ quoted text not captured ] Isn't the broblem what gets burned first on next untap ? Both cards trigger on untap and if I remember right the controller of minion decides which goes first ? Or did I miss something in here ?

LSJ

[ quoted text not captured ] The player whose untap it is (who also happens to be the controller of both the Vitae Block and the Punish -- and who is not the controller of the target vampire) orders the effects as she likes. Typically, this will be the blood-return bit on Vitae Block first (sending the blood to the bank instead).

tongu...@comcast.net

Cool, Thank you all very much! I'll begin work on the deck and try to post it.