LSJ- which goes first?Form of mist or Fast reaction

What if Vamp A gets blocked and plays form of mist at superior, vamp C (not the blocker) then plays fast reaction, which goes first? the action at +1 stealth or the combat via Fast Reaction? to make things more complex, what about if Vamp D plays hidden lurker? Thanks Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/

mads...@my-deja.com wrote: > What if Vamp A gets blocked and plays form of mist at superior, vamp C > (not the blocker) then plays fast reaction, which goes first? the > action at +1 stealth or the combat via Fast Reaction? Combat. (And the continuance of the action is nullified). * Any effect that starts a new combat after the combat that was ended by superior Form of Mist (or continues the combat that was ended) will nullify the "continue action" effect. This includes Psyche (superior), Fast Reaction, Hidden Lurker, and Telepathic Tracking. [LSJ 19980109] > to make things more complex, what about if Vamp D plays hidden lurker? Same thing, assuming you mean "... instead of Vamp C playing Fast Reaction." -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) VTES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/ [ quoted text not captured ]

LSJ wrote: > Combat. (And the continuance of the action is nullified). > > * Any effect that starts a new combat after the combat that was > ended by superior Form of Mist (or continues the combat that > was ended) will nullify the "continue action" effect. This > includes Psyche (superior), Fast Reaction, Hidden Lurker, and > Telepathic Tracking. [LSJ 19980109] > So, can an acting vampire still "continue action", if he goes a second round and play Form Of The Mist while a third vampire (C) had played Fast Reaction on him? In case of a vampire(B) playing Hidden Lurker (action modifier), can this vampire play Form Of The Mist to continue the "current action" declared by the acting vampire(A)? GP41

>So, can an acting vampire still "continue action", if he goes a second >round and play Form Of The Mist while a third vampire (C) had played >Fast Reaction on him? > >In case of a vampire(B) playing Hidden Lurker (action modifier), can >this vampire play Form Of The Mist to continue the "current action" >declared by the acting vampire(A)? Yes you can continue the action if you play that card during the subsequent combat. (First round you Majesty or Earth Meld, someone plays a TT/Fast Reaction/ Hidden Lurker and then second round you Form of Mist to continue the action). Note that if you play FoM during the first action and a second combat begins, you can't play another FoM (since only one action modifier per action). Halcyan 2

"GP41" <GP...@videotron.ca> a écrit dans le message news: 3A667764...@videotron.ca... > > In case of a vampire(B) playing Hidden Lurker (action modifier), can > this vampire play Form Of The Mist to continue the "current action" > declared by the acting vampire(A)? > > GP41 I think halcyan did not understand this question at all, so his answer is all wrong. what do you think ? Bear Paw Bleeds you for Three. You block ? okay, Earth meld,combat ends. I play hidden Lurker with Basilia, and enter combat. My strike is : i continue Bear Paw's bleeding action at +1 Stealth. NO WAY ! reyda

>> In case of a vampire(B) playing Hidden Lurker (action modifier), can >> this vampire play Form Of The Mist to continue the "current action" >> declared by the acting vampire(A)? >> >> GP41 > >I think halcyan did not understand this question at all, so his answer is >all wrong. > >what do you think ? >Bear Paw Bleeds you for Three. You block ? okay, Earth meld,combat ends. I >play hidden Lurker with Basilia, and enter combat. My strike is : i continue >Bear Paw's bleeding action at +1 Stealth. >NO WAY ! Sorry. You're right. Boy am I bad! =) Halcyan 2

Halcyan 2 a écrit: [ quoted text not captured ] I hope so. And indeed, that was my question. Thanx for the clarification. Merci Reyda. GP41