[LSK] : Daring The Dawn and Mask Of The 1000 Faces + NRA

Situation : Vampire A bleeds with Legal Manipulations at pre. Some vampire blocks Vampire A plays Daring The Dawn All players refuse to block. Vampire B plays Mask of the 1000 Faces and takes over the action. Questions : - Who gets the aggrevated damage from Daring the Dawn ( I would say vampire A, because it says "this vampire") - Can vampire A bleed again in the same turn (I would say yes, because when the action resolves B was the acting vampire) - Vampire B needs to have for/FOR to be able to play the Mask (I would say yes) - Vampire B needs to have pre/PRE to be able to play the Mask (I would say yes) thx johannes walch

Johannes Walch wrote: > Situation : Who is LSK? :-) > Vampire A bleeds with Legal Manipulations at pre. Some vampire blocks > Vampire A plays Daring The Dawn > All players refuse to block. > Vampire B plays Mask of the 1000 Faces and takes over the action. > > Questions : > > - Who gets the aggrevated damage from Daring the Dawn ( I would say vampire > A, because it says "this vampire") The acting vampire (note the wording in the superior - to rule the other way would mean that no damage is done at all in superior since the vampire A is no longer acting) > - Can vampire A bleed again in the same turn (I would say yes, because when > the action resolves B was the acting vampire) Yes. > - Vampire B needs to have for/FOR to be able to play the Mask (I would say > yes) Yes. (for is DtD was played at normal, FOR if DtD was played at superior). > - Vampire B needs to have pre/PRE to be able to play the Mask (I would say > yes) Yes, as above. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

LSJ wrote: :: Johannes Walch wrote: ::: Situation : :: :: Who is LSK? :: :-) maybe LSJ before the Errata ;))

> The acting vampire (note the wording in the superior - to rule the other way > would mean that no damage is done at all in superior since the vampire A is no > longer acting) Sounds reasonable. I did not look at the superior version.

"LSJ" <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote in message news:3E785173...@white-wolf.com... > Johannes Walch wrote: > > Situation : > > Who is LSK? > :-) Scott, I believe you forgot to preface your response with... "IANLSK" -Robert

"Robert Goudie" <rrgo...@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:oz%da.8929$pK4.7...@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net... [ quoted text not captured ] Well, maybe he IS LSK! Luscious Scott Kandy! Mystery solved. -Mike Ooi