Memories of Mortality Q [LSJ]

playing my new and improved ally deck last night brought up a few questions. 1. can a vamp under memories of mortality play weather control/carrion crows and have those effects damage an ally in combat? 2. how about blood to water? would it burn the ally or not? 3.how about retainers ie. wolf companion, murder of crows etc.? basically can any enviromental damage generated by a vamp under a MoM damage an ally? Ken

Ken shaw wrote: > playing my new and improved ally deck last night brought up a few questions. > > 1. can a vamp under memories of mortality play weather control/carrion crows > and have those effects damage an ally in combat? Yes. MoM only reduces damage inflicted by the vampire. > 2. how about blood to water? would it burn the ally or not? Yes. It's not damage. > 3.how about retainers ie. wolf companion, murder of crows etc.? basically > can any enviromental damage generated by a vamp under a MoM damage an ally? Yes. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

"LSJ" <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote in message news:3B30C1F4...@white-wolf.com... > Ken shaw wrote: > > playing my new and improved ally deck last night brought up a few questions. > > > > 1. can a vamp under memories of mortality play weather control/carrion crows > > and have those effects damage an ally in combat? > > Yes. MoM only reduces damage inflicted by the vampire. > > > 2. how about blood to water? would it burn the ally or not? > > Yes. It's not damage. > > > 3.how about retainers ie. wolf companion, murder of crows etc.? basically > > can any enviromental damage generated by a vamp under a MoM damage an ally? > > Yes. > So MoM is different from the way charnas the imp handles enviromental damage? relevant ruling is: Cannot be damaged by host, but does not stop host from using effects which would normally damage it. For example, the host can use Body of Sun, but would not damage Charnas as a result. [RTR 19941109] [ quoted text not captured ]

Ken shaw wrote: > So MoM is different from the way charnas the imp handles enviromental > damage? > relevant ruling is: > > Cannot be damaged by host, but does not stop host from using effects which > would normally damage it. For example, the host can use Body of Sun, but > would not damage Charnas as a result. [RTR 19941109] Body of Sun is not environmental. [ quoted text not captured ]