rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

2 vamp crypt

15 messages from 11 participants · 18 September 2001 – 19 September 2001
original thread on Google Groups

JC

has anyone tried building a tournament-worthy deck using only 2 very good vamps ? JC

X_Zealot

I have. It is called "Gruesome Twosome". It consists of Jacko and Bronwen. I will post it once I transcribe it to EDLB Comments Welcome, Norman S. Brown, Jr. XZealot Archon of the Swamp "JC" <jan-christoph...@cre.fr> wrote in message news:66e27269.01091...@posting.google.com... [ quoted text not captured ]

Brad Ward

jan-christoph...@cre.fr (JC) wrote in message news:<66e27269.01091...@posting.google.com>... > has anyone tried building a tournament-worthy deck using only 2 very good vamps ? I have built a Tournament deck with a crypt of only 1 vampire (GO spirodonas!) I played it in a 33 player tournament and won. -Brad prince of NLV

Jesper Bøje

Well Iv made a Tzh deck using potence using only Lambarch and Dragos. It did pretty good. But its a long time ago. /Jesper "JC" <jan-christoph...@cre.fr> skrev i en meddelelse news:66e27269.01091...@posting.google.com... [ quoted text not captured ]

Matt Latham

"JC" <jan-christoph...@cre.fr> wrote in message news:66e27269.01091...@posting.google.com... > has anyone tried building a tournament-worthy deck using only 2 very good vamps ? > > JC I think Derek Rey built a brilliant deck with only Omaya and Gunther in it... (I know Derek built it, I know it was brilliant, but I forget if there were other vamps in it other than Omaya and Gunther) Matt Denizen of the Sewers of Detroit

Derek Ray

On Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:03:56 -0400, "Matt Latham" <mla...@diamondtoolmfg.com> wrote: >"JC" <jan-christoph...@cre.fr> wrote in message >news:66e27269.01091...@posting.google.com... >> has anyone tried building a tournament-worthy deck using only 2 very good >vamps ? >> > >I think Derek Ray built a brilliant deck with only Omaya and Gunther in >it... (I know Derek built it, I know it was brilliant, but I forget if there >were other vamps in it other than Omaya and Gunther) *snort* now i'm embarrassed. However, there were a number of other vamps other than Omaya/Gunther; mostly weenies, intended to be brought out to take bleed-for-1 actions while Omaya/Gunther walled up to defend all my pool gain and toys. -- Derek AGITATOR, n. A statesman who shakes the fruit trees of his neighbors -- to dislodge the worms.

Ian Lee

>has anyone tried building a tournament-worthy deck using only 2 very good >vamps ? One of our tournaments was won by a deck that played just Cailean and Fred the Weak, IIRC.

Peter Oh

JC <jan-christoph...@cre.fr> wrote in message news:66e27269.01091...@posting.google.com... > has anyone tried building a tournament-worthy deck using only 2 very good vamps ? I know that Josh Duffin has a Jost Werner, Rebekka Chantry Elder deck using Pulses for bleeds of 3 at 1 stealth. And I know he's at least thought of playing it in a tournament before Peteo

Peter Oh

Ian Lee <cur...@aol.com> wrote in message news:20010918161137...@mb-mb.aol.com... > > One of our tournaments was won by a deck that played just Cailean and Fred the > Weak, IIRC. How in the name of Butros Butros Golly did that work? *scratches head in utter confusion* Cailean sets range and then in comes Freddy with his scary presence? I set the range to long and then S:CE!!!! ;-) Peteo

Ian Lee

>Cailean sets range and then in comes Freddy with his scary presence? While there was 1 or 2 presence bleed cards, Fred's pretty much just around to enable Waste Management Operation.

....salem christ....

[ quoted text not captured ] i'm sure a legal manipulation with a cloak the gathering from cailean wouldn't go astray every now and then, either... salem...

LSJ

JC wrote: > > has anyone tried building a tournament-worthy deck using only 2 very good vamps ? Someone at Dragon*Con had a Smudge-only crypt. It accumulated 1 or 2 VP, IIRC. -- LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc. Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

Halcyan 2

>Someone at Dragon*Con had a Smudge-only crypt. It accumulated 1 or 2 VP, >IIRC. Go Smudge! Any idea what the deck actually did? Halcyan 2

LSJ

[ quoted text not captured ] It was an ally deck. Smudge only came out if Jake Washington didn't appear in the opening hand to being recruiting Rafastio Ghouls. Lots of Memories of Mortalitys to go around. [ quoted text not captured ]

Derek Ray

On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:08:19 -0400, LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote: >Halcyan 2 wrote: >> >> >Someone at Dragon*Con had a Smudge-only crypt. It accumulated 1 or 2 VP, >> >IIRC. >> >> Go Smudge! Any idea what the deck actually did? > >It was an ally deck. Smudge only came out if Jake Washington didn't appear >in the opening hand to being recruiting Rafastio Ghouls. Lots of Memories of >Mortalitys to go around. Smudge came out four times in the game I played against it. (burned twice by a self-played Vulnerability, once by diablerie, i believe) It got 1VP in that game despite not getting Jake Washington for the first four, five turns. :) I don't know what it got the other round. [ quoted text not captured ]