rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

treatment (delayed)

1 message from 1 participant · 09 February 1998
original thread on Google Groups

LSJ

On VTES-L, "salem christ...." <k940...@BOHM.ANU.EDU.AU> wrote: > hi lsj... > > you said in one post a while ago something about "the treatment" still > working even if the vamp it is played on no longer is a prince. Well, I said that it remained on the vampire even when he loses his Prince title. (Mailed on 27 Jan 1998, message available in LOG9801D, also posted to newsgroup: Message-ID <34CDDE...@wizards.com>) > no, with mask, you said that if, say, dimple masked a "ritual challenge" > action then it would fizzle because dimple is not the "acting gangrel" when > the action resolves. > now, the treatment says "when this prince untaps, it takes one damage". > when the vampire with this card untaps, in the hypothetical situation given > in the previous post, it isn't a prince. so the text for the effect of > _untapping_ is no satisfied. there is no untapping prince with this card. > therefore, i feel, no damage should be done. I concur. > but call me wrong if you want. but then you'd have to do something about > mask 1k faces to make me completely happy. O:) I am not empowered to change the ruling on Mask1K. -- L. Scott Johnson (vte...@wizards.com) Official VtES Net.Rep for Wizards of the Coast. (*) - Subject to review by Rules Team