Is there any way to use this vamp?
Miguel Cordovera
Tremere
Capacity: 6
AUS DOM POT THA
Group: 5
Camarilla: During your predator's minion phase, your predator may burn
a pool to untap and take control of Miguel until the end of the minion
phase. +1 bleed.
Set: Keepers of Tradition.
Thanks in advance.
[ quoted text not captured ]
Clan Impersonation
Type: Action
Cost: 2 blood
+1 stealth action.
Choose a clan and put this card on the acting vampire. This vampire is
considered to be of the chosen clan instead of his or her original
clan (if any). This vampire can burn this card as an action.
Reindoctrination
Type: Action
Requires: Tremere/Tremere antitribu
Cost: 2 blood
+1 stealth action.
Choose a younger Gargoyle. That Gargoyle loses any existing slave
status and becomes a slave to this acting vampire's clan. Take control
of the Gargoyle if another Methuselah controls him or her, move the
Gargoyle to your ready region, and untap him or her.
I'm sure you can do the math.
[ quoted text not captured ]
His flaw can actually be used as an advantage. Barring your predator
playing a rush deck, you can expect your predator to spend the pool to
take him and bleed you for at least 2.
So pack lots and lots of deflections, and by bounceing Miguel's bleed
you equivalently get a BONUS bleed for 2 against your prey.
[ quoted text not captured ]
Heidelberg, Red list and some agg is also good......
Make him red list after he gets taken. If he does not get taken, he
just bleeds for 5, repeatedly.
Either way, garvy. If he gets taken, biscuits too!
Add in that silly ally that swims upstream....
On Apr 2, 3:02 pm, Blooded Sand <sandm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Miguel Cordovera
> > > Tremere
> > > Capacity: 6
> > > AUS DOM POT THA
> > > Group: 5
> > > Camarilla: During your predator's minion phase, your predator may burn
> > > a pool to untap and take control of Miguel until the end of the minion
> > > phase. +1 bleed.
> > > Set: Keepers of Tradition.
>> Heidelberg, Red list and some agg is also good......
> Make him red list after he gets taken. If he does not get taken, he
> just bleeds for 5, repeatedly.
> Either way, garvy. If he gets taken, biscuits too!
> Add in that silly ally that swims upstream....
He's only taken for a short while though, so making him redlist would
hurt you more than anyone else I think,
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 05:41:48 -0700 (PDT), henrik <www.h...@gmail.com>
wrote:
[ quoted text not captured ]
Well, I'm sort of okay-ish with Math, but I'm not sure about the Physics
of this example. :) Miguel's Text is not overwritten, so your predator
can still gravitate him into his ready region whenever he desires. So
if he wants a rescue, or just wants to lunge and remove a potential
blocker, he can just take him even as a Slave.
All this for 2 actions and 4 blood... To mitigate (not eliminate) the
drawback of a vampire who isn't terribly superior to begin with (he is
a nice 8-cap and a hideous drawback packed into a 6-cap).
--
Regards,
Daneel
[ quoted text not captured ]
I'd say... if you play lots of bounce, and are generally a bleed deck,
you might use the guy, as a way to do pool damage to your predator and
potentially ensure the bleeds to bounce.
However, it's risky in the sense that 1-turn control many times ends up
diablerizing and burning or doing some daredevil feat like going for
the Path of Metamorphosis...
--
Regards,
Daneel
[ quoted text not captured ]
One thing I noticed about this guy is that he shares his 4 superior
disciplines with Cesewayo.
In a No Secrets From Cesewayo Deck, he might be worth trying, since you
can guarantee blocking him in an emergency, which makes it less desirable
to pay the pool to take him.
(Yes, I know, this idea sucks.)
[ quoted text not captured ]
Well, it looks to me like you make Miguel a Gargoyle. So your pred
can't use him to do D actions unless you have a Tremere (presumably, or
maybe !Tre). And as soon as the other Meth controls him, you take
control of him and move him to your ready region, and untap him.
>
> All this for 2 actions and 4 blood... To mitigate (not eliminate) the
> drawback of a vampire who isn't terribly superior to begin with (he is
> a nice 8-cap and a hideous drawback packed into a 6-cap).
>
Agreed there.
best -
chris
On Apr 2, 12:22 pm, librarian <aucti...@superfuncards.com> wrote:
> Daneel wrote:> > On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 05:41:48 -0700 (PDT), henrik <www.hen...@gmail.com>[ quoted text not captured ]
Umm... Miguel's disad doesn't let the other methuselah *keep* him -
he only gets him for the turn, and since you can't act during another
methuselah's turn (with the 2 exceptions that require you to wait
until that meth is done acting anyway), you don't have any chance to
use Reindoctrination to take control of him, unless he's, like, Mind
Raped or something.
On 2 huhti, 20:57, Chris Berger <ark...@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:
> Umm... Miguel's disad doesn't let the other methuselah *keep* him -
> he only gets him for the turn, and since you can't act during another
> methuselah's turn (with the 2 exceptions that require you to wait
> until that meth is done acting anyway), you don't have any chance to
> use Reindoctrination to take control of him, unless he's, like, Mind
> Raped or something.
I assume Reindoctrination is there to make Miguel a Slave. AFAIK Slave-
status doesn't come with Impersonation.
[ quoted text not captured ]
I was responding specifically to this: "And as soon as the other Meth
controls him, you take
control of him and move him to your ready region, and untap him. "
That can basically never happen without some other form of minion-
stealing, in which case it would apply equally-well to any vampire,
not just Miguel. I get why you'd want to make Miguel a slave (and
untap him), but as Daneel mentioned, 2 actions and 4 blood to mitigate
the disadvantage of a 6 cap who is no better than the average 8
cap.... doesn't really seem worth it.
On Apr 2, 8:26 pm, Chris Berger <ark...@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:
> That can basically never happen without some other form of minion-
> stealing, in which case it would apply equally-well to any vampire,
> not just Miguel. I get why you'd want to make Miguel a slave (and
> untap him), but as Daneel mentioned, 2 actions and 4 blood to mitigate
> the disadvantage of a 6 cap who is no better than the average 8
> cap.... doesn't really seem worth it.
That was kinda the point from the start. The vamp's not really worth
it.
Unless you're playing a really weird deck you won't get much more out
of him than some other 6cap.
[ quoted text not captured ]
Are you serious with this? Isn´t is much more likely he goes anarch/
diablerises somebody/removes Smiling Jack/etc, especially when the
meth notices you have "pack lots and lots of deflections"?
[ quoted text not captured ]
More likely to take those other actions with requirements than to
bleed? No.
He can only go anarch once, which means your predator spends a pool to
burn 2 blood off of him - big deal.
Removing Smiling Jack on your predator's turn means you don't have to
deal with it, which is great (assuming you're smart enough not to play
a Miguel/Smiling Jack deck, unless you've got some other crazy idea up
your sleeve).
Diablerie might be an option, might not. Even if it's an option and
isn't blocked, that doesn't mean Miguel automatically burns...
On Apr 2, 9:08 pm, XZealot <xzea...@cox.net> wrote:
> POT DOM with inscriptions to give the other POT DOM vampires Rutor's
> Hands?
Using a crap vampire to play a crap card to allow other decent
vampires to use a crap card?
Yeah, right..
[ quoted text not captured ]
Why not?
What would have been the alternative? Another Selena, perhaps?
Perhaps it is better there are vampire who are food for thought, even
though they might still end up being crap.
as...@hotmail.com wrote:
>Exactelly my point. THIS VAMPIRE SUCKS. LSJ, why did you invent this
>shitty vamp?
So Ashur, when did you stop beating your wife?
--
James Coupe
PGP Key: 0x5D623D5D YOU ARE IN ERROR.
EBD690ECD7A1FB457CA2 NO-ONE IS SCREAMING.
13D7E668C3695D623D5D THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION.
James Coupe wrote:
> as...@hotmail.com wrote:>> Exactelly my point. THIS VAMPIRE SUCKS. LSJ, why did you invent this
>> shitty vamp?>
> So Ashur, when did you stop beating your wife?
>
I'll just heat up the stove, eh? Put some of these corn kernels in the
pan, a bit of oil, put the lid on...
best-
chris
[ quoted text not captured ]
This is true, most decks just wouldn't be prepared to take advantage
of his action (which costs one pool) in any other way than bleeding.
Maybe POT or THA rush-combat if you're unlucky.
Your predator will definitely not take control of Miguel if he is at
zero blood, unless they have Life in the City or Heidelburg or
whatever. Perhaps a strategy can be to end all your turns with him
tapped and empty, and next untap give him a blood with a hunting
ground, which he should spend on something.
Would your predator take control if he's in torpor? Probably not,
unless they really want that +1 stealth to diablerize him. Tremere can
use the Chantry every turn, so there might be a trick deck somewhere
in there.
If you can't do either of those, Diamond Thunderbolt or simply
deflecting his bleed for 2 (or more) work just as well. It can be a
bluffing game, and eventually your predator will be too discouraged to
try spending a pool for MAYBE an extra bleed, but usually nothing.
On 2 Apr, 22:40, James Coupe <ja...@zephyr.org.uk> wrote:
> as...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >Exactelly my point. THIS VAMPIRE SUCKS. LSJ, why did you invent this
> >shitty vamp?
>
> So Ashur, when did you stop beating your wife?
That´s not your business. I asked a simple question (although based on
my opinion. I guess I am allowed both having an opinion and asking
questions). Stick to the subject?
[ quoted text not captured ]
Do you have a wall that needs covering? Do you have a child who loves
collages?
You do! Then do we have Vampire: The Eternal Struggle cards for you!!
You can give them Dramatic Upheavals! Miguel Cordoveras! Protect
Thine Owns!
They will have endless hours of cutting, pasting and affixing their
fingers and ears to bits of newspaper right in the comfort of your own
living room! And do they save space on storage!? You can fit
hundreds of them in a space the size of a shoebox!
So give your children hours of fun! Give them Crap Vampire: The
Eternal Struggle Cards!!
as...@hotmail.com wrote:
>On 2 Apr, 22:40, James Coupe <ja...@zephyr.org.uk> wrote:>> as...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> >Exactelly my point. THIS VAMPIRE SUCKS. LSJ, why did you invent this
>> >shitty vamp?
>>
>> So Ashur, when did you stop beating your wife?>>That愀 not your business. I asked a simple question (although based on>my opinion. I guess I am allowed both having an opinion and asking
>questions). Stick to the subject?
*How* you ask a question is as important as the question you ask.
Have you considered that you're asking a question that is both a loaded
question and a leading question? You'll get better discussions if you
ask better questions.
Example of a fairly open-ended question that isn't hostile:
Hey LSJ, were there any reasons for this design? Some backstory,
perhaps?
Example of a bad question that is actively hostile:
THIS VAMPIRE SUCKS. LSJ, why did you invent this shitty vamp?
I can't think of a single example of LSJ responding to hostile,
accusatory questions of this nature. I point this out, because it might
be interesting to hear LSJ's thoughts - but that's unlikely to happen
when you're acting like a douche.
[ quoted text not captured ]
On 3 Apr, 01:09, James Coupe <ja...@zephyr.org.uk> wrote:
> as...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >On 2 Apr, 22:40, James Coupe <ja...@zephyr.org.uk> wrote:
> >> as...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >> >Exactelly my point. THIS VAMPIRE SUCKS. LSJ, why did you invent this
> >> >shitty vamp?
>
> >> So Ashur, when did you stop beating your wife?
>> >That´s not your business. I asked a simple question (although based on> >my opinion. I guess I am allowed both having an opinion and asking
> >questions). Stick to the subject?
>
> *How* you ask a question is as important as the question you ask.
No it is not. And you are not my dad. You don´t have an opinion on the
actual subject do you? Just wan´t to bug me?
XZealot wrote:
> On Apr 2, 3:22 pm, henrik <www.hen...@gmail.com> wrote:>> On Apr 2, 9:08 pm, XZealot <xzea...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> POT DOM with inscriptions to give the other POT DOM vampires Rutor's
>>> Hands?>>
>> Using a crap vampire to play a crap card to allow other decent
>> vampires to use a crap card?
LOL !!
>>
>> Yeah, right..>
> Rutor's Hand is awesome!
It is.
But :
a) there already is a good Pot / Dom / Tha crypt
b) a few Tha skills and THA giving equipments is a much easier way to go
c) if it's only for the untap, there is also an excellent Pot / Dom / For
crypt, and a For skill gives immediate access ton inf Freak Drive.
OTOH Miguel's special isn't that bad if you can "take" a few bleeds for 2.
For instance, it would be better in a "reduce bleed" deck than in a bouncing
deck (which are better, but hey...). But everybody plays Dominate, so it's
still risky...
------
Trent is GOD !
Orpheus
as...@hotmail.com wrote:
>On 3 Apr, 01:09, James Coupe <ja...@zephyr.org.uk> wrote:>> *How* you ask a question is as important as the question you ask.>
>No it is not.
Nonsense of the highest order.
I cannot remember seeing LSJ answer a hostile question of the sort you
ask. I can remember seeing LSJ answer a variety of polite questions.
You don't think there's a difference?
You may have noticed that LSJ is posting away in other threads where
questions are being asked, and hasn't responded to your question. Do
you wonder why that might be? The evidence seems to be on my side here.
>You don´t have an opinion on the
>actual subject do you? Just wan´t to bug me?
If having it pointed out that your question almost certainly won't get
answered bugs you, that's your problem, not mine. If you want to ask
hostile questions badly and pretend that the way your questions are
asked doesn't matter, that's your problem, not mine.
I do have an opinion on the subject, but expressing it would largely be
repeating what other people have already said - so not a lot of point
doing that. However, I would quite like to see what LSJ's thoughts
were, but that's pretty unlikely with your shouting and stamping. I
point this out in the hope that, in the future, when an interesting line
of discussion comes up, you won't feel the need to yell hostile,
accusatory questions which will shut off any likelihood of them actually
being answered.
Either you want the question answered - in which case, you're going
completely the wrong way about it - or you just want to yell abuse at
LSJ, which is dumb.
[ quoted text not captured ]
On Apr 3, 8:55 am, as...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Thanks for the lecture in social behavior dad.
Sometimes, it is good when someone acts like your dad. Or a dad.
Really.
-Peter
XZealot wrote:
> On Apr 2, 7:16 am, as...@hotmail.com wrote:>> Is there any way to use this vamp?
>>
>> Miguel Cordovera
>> Tremere
>> Capacity: 6
>> AUS DOM POT THA
>> Group: 5
>> Camarilla: During your predator's minion phase, your predator may
>> burn a pool to untap and take control of Miguel until the end of the
>> minion phase. +1 bleed.
>> Set: Keepers of Tradition.>
> His flaw can actually be used as an advantage. Barring your predator
> playing a rush deck, you can expect your predator to spend the pool to
> take him and bleed you for at least 2.
>
> So pack lots and lots of deflections, and by bounceing Miguel's bleed
> you equivalently get a BONUS bleed for 2 against your prey.
What the heck ?!
You'd risk deflecting a helpless minion to your prey if he's playing fight ?
Orpheus
Blooded Sand wrote:
> On Apr 2, 2:53 pm, XZealot <xzea...@cox.net> wrote:>> On Apr 2, 7:16 am, as...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>> Is there any way to use this vamp?>>>>> Miguel Cordovera
>>> Tremere
>>> Capacity: 6
>>> AUS DOM POT THA
>>> Group: 5
>>> Camarilla: During your predator's minion phase, your predator may
>>> burn a pool to untap and take control of Miguel until the end of
>>> the minion phase. +1 bleed.
>>> Set: Keepers of Tradition.>>
>> His flaw can actually be used as an advantage. Barring your predator
>> playing a rush deck, you can expect your predator to spend the pool
>> to take him and bleed you for at least 2.
>>
>> So pack lots and lots of deflections, and by bounceing Miguel's bleed
>> you equivalently get a BONUS bleed for 2 against your prey.>> Heidelberg, Red list and some agg is also good......
> Make him red list after he gets taken. If he does not get taken, he
> just bleeds for 5, repeatedly.
> Either way, garvy. If he gets taken, biscuits too!
> Add in that silly ally that swims upstream....
Nah...
The only thing that could prevent him from being taken, ever, is a lot of
Reversal of Fortune called out of turn, preventing your pred to ever play.
A lot of setup for a small advantage though. Could be worth for Sonja Blue,
though...
Orpheus
On Apr 3, 7:55 am, as...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On 3 Apr, 11:46, James Coupe <ja...@zephyr.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the lecture in social behavior dad.
Okay, here's a lecture in social behavior that *doesn't* sound like
your dad...
Quit acting like such a dickhead all the time.
Short and sweet. Hope this helps.
[ quoted text not captured ]
Well, I don´t do it all the time, but when I rip up a booster and feel
tricked on my money, I feel like using that language to make my point.
as...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On 3 Apr, 16:13, Chris Berger <ark...@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:>> On Apr 3, 7:55 am, as...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On 3 Apr, 11:46, James Coupe <ja...@zephyr.org.uk> wrote:>>>>> Thanks for the lecture in social behavior dad.>>
>> Okay, here's a lecture in social behavior that *doesn't* sound like
>> your dad...
>>
>> Quit acting like such a dickhead all the time.
>>
>> Short and sweet. Hope this helps.>
> Well, I don´t do it all the time, but when I rip up a booster and feel
> tricked on my money, I feel like using that language to make my point.
Not wanting to add on the "anti-Ashur" rant here. But there are many, many
vampires (or Rare cards for that matter) that make me feel more "ripped for
my money" then Miguel. Yeah, he's nigh unplayable. But less-than-average
vampires in crypts with much better choices will seldom see the light of,
erm, night either.
And really, crappy Rares are much worse when you open boosts than a few
unplayable vampires.
Just my 2-non-paternal-necrocents
Orpheus
On Apr 3, 10:19 am, as...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Well, I don´t do it all the time, but when I rip up a booster and feel
> tricked on my money, I feel like using that language to make my point.
Tricked on your money? Really? By a vampire of questionable utility?
There are countless crappy cards all over the new set. All over all
the sets. 'Cause not all cards can be the best ones. Miguel is
certainly a fringey vampire. But someone somewhere is going to be
intrigued enough to try out something interesting with him (see: Sonja
Blue or Uriah Winter or Jacob the Glitch).
That is the one card that pushes you over the edge?
-Peter
[ quoted text not captured ]
Granted, it's a good safety. If your allies don't elaborate a "burning
plan", of course (not like if I'd never seen it happen...).
Orpheus
Howdy,
On Apr 2, 5:16 am, as...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Is there any way to use this vamp?
>
> Miguel Cordovera
> Tremere
> Capacity: 6
> AUS DOM POT THA
> Group: 5
> Camarilla: During your predator's minion phase, your predator may burn
> a pool to untap and take control of Miguel until the end of the minion
> phase. +1 bleed.
> Set: Keepers of Tradition.
>> Thanks in advance.
The best use for Miguel Cordovera: Trade him for a different vampire
to someone who is trying to complete a KoT set. Or potentially sell
him for, uh, $.10 on eBay?
Other than that, I've got nothing.
Hope that helps,
Alex
On Apr 3, 1:00 pm, wedge <matt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> He could work with Salubri! w/Aversion and maybe Burnt Offerings.
> Of course I don't know why they would want to work with him.
Maybe Ponticulus / Talbot's Chainsaw is a good enough reason.
[ quoted text not captured ]
I keep trying to block that out. Even the Rowan Ring is a melee
weapon.
So what is it a unique ranged weapon that only does damage at close.
Talbots may be the best example of a melee weapon VTES has to offer.
Melee (from the French mêlée IPA: [meˈleː]) generally refers to
disorganized close combat involving a group of fighters. A melee
ensues when groups become locked together in combat with no regard to
group tactics or fighting as an organized unit; each participant
fights as an individual.[1]
Oh well, Miguel Cordovera can still be used for collages.
wedge wrote:
> He could work with Salubri! w/Aversion and maybe Burnt Offerings.
> Of course I don't know why they would want to work with him.
Is Aversion cumulative ?
On 3 Apr, 16:31, Peter D Bakija <p...@lightlink.com> wrote:
> 'Cause not all cards can be the best ones.
No, I have never suggested that. But they can at least be playable. Is
it to much to ask?
> That is the one card that pushes you over the edge?
It was a good example.
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:18:33 -0700 (PDT), wumpus <wum...@comcast.net>
wrote:
[ quoted text not captured ]
Something I haven't seen in the thread.
Useful if you drain him. Put him out, get all but one blood off him.
Govern. He's now on zero.
Let your opponent steal him. He can only do one thing. You've already
recovered his cost with the drainage. Use of Blood Doll/Vessel/Hunting
Ground, and you're set (you can push blood on, your pred can't).
Without a lot of blood, and few stealth disciplines, a 1 blood vamp
might be a little fragile, but he does do it with 4 superior
disciplines. Surely someone can come up with something.
Morgan Vening
On Apr 4, 9:14 am, as...@hotmail.com wrote:
> No, I have never suggested that. But they can at least be playable. Is
> it to much to ask?
Sure. But every once and a while, cards that don't seem readily
playable come out, and eventually people figure out good things to do
with them (again, see: Sonja Blue and Uriah Winter). Some folks really
enjoy figuring out things to do with sub-optimal seeming cards. Should
all cards be really difficult to use well? Of course not. But if every
once and a while, we get something like Miguel (who someone will find
some great thing to do with eventually) that seems like total trash,
but someone is going to enjoy trying to make gold.
-Peter
Morgan Vening <mor...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>> Miguel Cordovera
>>> Tremere
>>> Capacity: 6
>>> AUS DOM POT THA
>>> Group: 5
>>> Camarilla: During your predator's minion phase, your predator may burn
>>> a pool to untap and take control of Miguel until the end of the minion
>>> phase. +1 bleed.
>>> Set: Keepers of Tradition.>>Something I haven't seen in the thread.
>
>Useful if you drain him. Put him out, get all but one blood off him.
>Govern. He's now on zero.
>
>Let your opponent steal him. He can only do one thing. You've already
>recovered his cost with the drainage. Use of Blood Doll/Vessel/Hunting
>Ground, and you're set (you can push blood on, your pred can't).
One problem is that - unless you put in some really fancy footwork[0] -
your predator gets the chance to steal him for a turn that before you
get the chance to act, and there aren't many ways to drain a vampire as
a reaction. So they pretty much get at least one turn to screw with
him.
[0] Some sort of out-of-turn Undue Influence, or something like that.
Can be ignored for practical purposes, really.
--
James Coupe
PGP Key: 0x5D623D5D YOU ARE IN ERROR.
EBD690ECD7A1FB457CA2 NO-ONE IS SCREAMING.
13D7E668C3695D623D5D THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION.
James Coupe wrote:
> Morgan Vening <mor...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:>>>> Miguel Cordovera
>>>> Tremere
>>>> Capacity: 6
>>>> AUS DOM POT THA
>>>> Group: 5
>>>> Camarilla: During your predator's minion phase, your predator may burn
>>>> a pool to untap and take control of Miguel until the end of the minion
>>>> phase. +1 bleed.
>>>> Set: Keepers of Tradition.>>
>>Something I haven't seen in the thread.
>>
>>Useful if you drain him. Put him out, get all but one blood off him.
>>Govern. He's now on zero.
>>
>>Let your opponent steal him. He can only do one thing. You've already
>>recovered his cost with the drainage. Use of Blood Doll/Vessel/Hunting
>>Ground, and you're set (you can push blood on, your pred can't).>
> One problem is that - unless you put in some really fancy footwork[0] -
pre-deployed heidelburg castle?
--
salem
(replace 'hotmail' with 'gmail' to email)
On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 22:14:07 +1000, Salem <kell...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
[ quoted text not captured ]
That works.
Initially, I figured you'd take the hit for 2 (hopefully bounce it),
thereafter, not worry about it (after draining him). Might not be
fantastic, but I don't see one or two in a power bleed deck being too
hard to manage. I don't think he'll ever be a star to the same extent
as Enkidu or the like, but in a deck that for the most part works well
anyway, I don't see him being the utter detriment others see.
Morgan Vening
On 2 avr, 22:40, James Coupe <ja...@zephyr.org.uk> wrote:
> as...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >Exactelly my point. THIS VAMPIRE SUCKS. LSJ, why did you invent this
> >shitty vamp?
>
> So Ashur, when did you stop beating your wife?
>
very interesting argument *rolleyes*
let's ignore this troll :)
i don't know why most thaumaturgists in the game get horrible flaws.
Jacob, miguel, schuyler, Andrew, Hector... the list goes on and on. Is
there some thematic at work ? because it looks like this change is
quite recent, i don't remember flawed tremere back in the old days.
Building a deck around them can be a good exercise though, but i
understand some people like Ashur feel ripped of their money when they
buy boosters only to find those nearly unplayable vampires. I don't
understand how they made it through the playstests.
Is it difficult to beat the efficiency of the 5 and 6 caps !/tremere
printed before gehenna ?
I just wonder who use them. Maybe it's the players who like to "shoot
themselves in the foot", like a golf player with a handicap ? :)
On Apr 9, 8:23 am, "Reyda !" <Rey...@gmail.com> wrote:
> very interesting argument *rolleyes*
> let's ignore this troll
(A: This was an argumentative analogy, where James was using an
example of "*how* you ask a question is just as important as the
question itself" and B: if you wanted people to ignore a "troll",
pointing out that they should ignore it, like, a week later, isn't
likely to accomplish much. Just sayin.)
-Peter
[ quoted text not captured ]
except it has nothing to do with the game we are talking about :)
if the question was "why don't you ask lsj if he beats his wife ?",
then i would be pleased ;)
sorry for not checking the time on the post ^^
On Apr 9, 7:51 pm, "Reyda !" <Rey...@gmail.com> wrote:
> except it has nothing to do with the game we are talking about :)
It was, ya know, a comparison. X=Y. "Why did you make such a sucky
piece of crap card?" = "have you stopped beating your wife?" (that
particular phrase being a very common, in english, example of "how a
badly asked question makes discussion go badly", see, 'cause asking
"have you stopped beating your wife?" and expecting an answer makes
the person answering imply that he started beating his wife at some
point, as opposed to being able to simply say "I don't beat my wife",
see. It is an illustration of how one words a question is important.)
> sorry for not checking the time on the post ^^
It happens. No big. Just pointing it out :-)
-Peter
On 10 avr, 02:03, Peter D Bakija <p...@lightlink.com> wrote:
> On Apr 9, 7:51 pm, "Reyda !" <Rey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > except it has nothing to do with the game we are talking about :)
>
> It was, ya know, a comparison. X=Y. "Why did you make such a sucky
> piece of crap card?" = "have you stopped beating your wife?" (that> particular phrase being a very common, in english)
ah ok, now i understand. In french we have some more colorful things
not involving the wife, like "did i ask you if your grandmother rides
a bicycle ?" I know it sounds strange, but it's very common here :)
On Apr 9, 8:59 pm, "Reyda !" <Rey...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ah ok, now i understand. In french we have some more colorful things
> not involving the wife, like "did i ask you if your grandmother rides
> a bicycle ?" I know it sounds strange, but it's very common here :)
Makes perfect sense to me :-)
-Petre
[ quoted text not captured ]> 13D7E668C3695D623D5D THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Yes thats true, there are ways to get the blood of him (Heidelberg
Castle and rave). But for a meth to have those cards, when you bring
out Miguel will not always be the circumstance. That also with risk
of getting him for 1 pool, then bleeding you while you might have a
deflect might be counterproductive. Then your deck could minimize his
threat with aversions as someone already pointed out. Frankly for
me, he isnt as debilitating as Pariah and he seems pretty solid as a
Potence Tremere. Im sure someone out there right now is tinkering
with him, even as we debate his overall usefulness. Lets not be in
such a rush to condemn a card based on his initial presentation.