rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

Telepathic Vote COunt

13 messages from 5 participants · 10 May 1995 – 17 May 1995
original thread on Google Groups

Charles Richard Robb

If Millicent Smith is out and someone has their vote blocked while controlling Millicent, will Telepathic Vote Counting [cancel current action and return vote card to your hand] keep trhe acting minion from being burned? I say no, but it happened last night and I'd like an official ruling from Tom if possible. I say the minion should be burned because the action was blocked.

L. Scott Johnson

In article <3opu8g$b...@nntp.msstate.edu>, [ quoted text not captured ] You can't play TVC at all unless the vote is called. Just like you can't play Business Pressure, Bribes, Scorn of Adonis, Bewitching Oration, Dread Gaze, nor Surpirise Influence unless the vote is actually called. So, no. -- ----- L. Scott Johnson (lsc...@crl.com) | The opinions expressed are mine Graphics Specialist and Jyhad Rulemonger | and subject to card text

CurtAdams

lsc...@crl.com (L. Scott Johnson) >In article <3opu8g$b...@nntp.msstate.edu>, >Charles Richard Robb <cr...@Ra.MsState.Edu> wrote: >>If Millicent Smith is out and someone has their vote blocked while controlling >>Millicent, will Telepathic Vote Counting [cancel current action and return >>vote card to your hand] keep trhe acting minion from being burned? > >>I say no, but it happened last night and I'd like an official ruling from >>Tom if possible. I say the minion should be burned because the action was >>blocked. > >You can't play TVC at all unless the vote is called. Just like you can't play >Business Pressure, Bribes, Scorn of Adonis, Bewitching Oration, Dread Gaze, >nor Surpirise Influence unless the vote is actually called. TVC doesn't say "only usable during a political action", so I don't see any reason why you can't play it prior to the vote being called. Also, I understood the political action (or any action) to include the attempt. If something said "only usable during a bleed action" would you say it could only be played at the instant the bleed resolves? Anyway, if you can play TVC during the runup, you can definitely escape combat. You play during your last opportunity to play stealth. The action has not yet been blocked. Curt Adams (curt...@aol.com)

L. Scott Johnson

In article <3oqm2s$l...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, CurtAdams <curt...@aol.com> wrote: >lsc...@crl.com (L. Scott Johnson) > >>In article <3opu8g$b...@nntp.msstate.edu>, >>Charles Richard Robb <cr...@Ra.MsState.Edu> wrote: >>>If Millicent Smith is out and someone has their vote blocked while >>>controlling >>>Millicent, will Telepathic Vote Counting [cancel current action and >>>return >>>vote card to your hand] keep trhe acting minion from being burned? >>> >>>I say no, but it happened last night and I'd like an official ruling >>>from >>>Tom if possible. I say the minion should be burned because the action >>>was >>>blocked. >> >>You can't play TVC at all unless the vote is called. Just like you can't >>play >>Business Pressure, Bribes, Scorn of Adonis, Bewitching Oration, Dread >>Gaze, >>nor Surpirise Influence unless the vote is actually called. > >TVC doesn't say "only usable during a political action", so I don't see >any reason why you can't play it prior to the vote being called. Also, I >understood the political action (or any action) to include the attempt. >If something said "only usable during a bleed action" would you say it >could only be played at the instant the bleed resolves? Well, unfortunately Political Actions don't have nice terminology. Cryptic Rider says: after a successful Politcal Action (vote)" but means (DTR:) after a successful Referendum. TVC says "cancel the *current* Political Action", meaning the current Referendum, and must therefore be played during the referendum. It should probably have errata (like Business Pressure) that it "can only be used during a Political Action", esp. since it says "current Political Action" on the card. Bleed action is clear. Political Action is not - since the rulebook uses it for too many things (the action and the referendum). > >Anyway, if you can play TVC during the runup, you can definitely escape >combat. You play during your last opportunity to play stealth. The >action has not yet been blocked. True enough. [ quoted text not captured ]

CurtAdams

>Well, unfortunately Political Actions don't have nice terminology. Amen. >TVC says "cancel the *current* Political Action", meaning the current >Referendum, and must therefore be played during the referendum. My terminology is: Political Action: Vampire attempting to call a vote Vote: Vampires and Methuseleh vote on a referendum. >It should probably have errata (like Business Pressure) that it "can only >be used during a Political Action", esp. since it says "current Political >Action" on the card. I've mentioned that the + vote cards look like they should be used only during the runup, as the "cancel vote" cards (TVC and Pulling Strings) have complicated mechanics if vampires can change the number of votes they cast during a referendum. >Bleed action is clear. >Political Action is not - since the rulebook uses it for too many things >(the action and the referendum). What would you call the political analogue to a bleed action? Curt Adams (curt...@aol.com)

L. Scott Johnson

In article <3or59h$p...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, CurtAdams <curt...@aol.com> wrote: >>Well, unfortunately Political Actions don't have nice terminology. >Amen. > >My terminology is: >Political Action: Vampire attempting to call a vote >Vote: Vampires and Methuseleh vote on a referendum. That's fine, but the cards' texts don follow your convention - or all of the "only usable during a political action" cards would say "only usable during a vote". (As I understand them). > >>It should probably have errata (like Business Pressure) that it "can only >>be used during a Political Action", esp. since it says "current Political >>Action" on the card. > >I've mentioned that the + vote cards look like they should be used only >during the runup, as the "cancel vote" cards (TVC and Pulling Strings) >have complicated mechanics if vampires can change the number of votes they >cast during a referendum. Well, I don't share that opinion - it is easy enough to retro-cancel and preempt-cancel a vampire's votes no matter when the votes are gained. > >>Bleed action is clear. >>Political Action is not - since the rulebook uses it for too many things >>(the action and the referendum). > >What would you call the political analogue to a bleed action? a bleed is instantaneous, a referendum is not. in that there is not analog. [ quoted text not captured ]

CurtAdams

lsc...@crl.com (L. Scott Johnson) writes: >>I've mentioned that the + vote cards look like they should be used only >>during the runup, as the "cancel vote" cards (TVC and Pulling Strings) >>have complicated mechanics if vampires can change the number of votes they >>cast during a referendum. >Well, I don't share that opinion - it is easy enough to retro-cancel and >preempt-cancel a vampire's votes no matter when the votes are gained. Easy - but not entirely obvious that one should. > >>>Bleed action is clear. >>>Political Action is not - since the rulebook uses it for too many things >>>(the action and the referendum). > >>What would you call the political analogue to a bleed action? > a bleed is instantaneous, a referendum is not. >in that there is not analog. A bleed action refers to the runup. What refers to the runup for a vote? Curt Adams (curt...@aol.com)

L. Scott Johnson

curt...@aol.com (CurtAdams) writes: >lsc...@crl.com (L. Scott Johnson) writes: >>>I've mentioned that the + vote cards look like they should be used only >>>during the runup, as the "cancel vote" cards (TVC and Pulling Strings) >>>have complicated mechanics if vampires can change the number of votes >they >>>cast during a referendum. >>Well, I don't share that opinion - it is easy enough to retro-cancel and >>preempt-cancel a vampire's votes no matter when the votes are gained. >Easy - but not entirely obvious that one should. Easy but complicated, eh? which argument do you want to use? :-) >>>>Bleed action is clear. >>>>Political Action is not - since the rulebook uses it for too many >things >>>>(the action and the referendum). >> >>>What would you call the political analogue to a bleed action? >> a bleed is instantaneous, a referendum is not. >>in that there is not analog. >A bleed action refers to the runup. What refers to the runup for a vote? Political Action refers to the runup. Unfortunately, it also refers to the Referendum. If it does not (as you seem to propose), then you can only play: Bewitching Oration, Surprise Influence, Dread Gaze, Business Pressure, Disarming Presence, Elder Kindred Network, etc. *before* terms are set (during the runup - the Political Action part). And some of these cards become redundant (Only during a Political Action before Votes are cast is redundant if Political Action doesn't refer to the Referendum). If the DT had been more clear, and used the term Referndum, then this conversation would not be necessary. To use "Bleed" for both the action runup and the action resolution creates no problems because the action resolution is instantaneous. The two are not the same animal. [ quoted text not captured ]

CurtAdams

lsc...@crl.com (L. Scott Johnson) >curt...@aol.com (CurtAdams) writes: >>lsc...@crl.com (L. Scott Johnson) writes: >>>>I've mentioned that the + vote cards look like they should be used only >>>>during the runup, as the "cancel vote" cards (TVC and Pulling Strings) >>>>have complicated mechanics if vampires can change the number of votes >>they >>>>cast during a referendum. >>>Well, I don't share that opinion - it is easy enough to retro-cancel and >>>preempt-cancel a vampire's votes no matter when the votes are gained. >>Easy - but not entirely obvious that one should. >Easy but complicated, eh? which argument do you want to use? :-) If a prince votes and then throws a Dread Gaze, IS he casting his votes again? If so, can he change how he cast the new votes - he should, since he is casting votes. Or is is that since he has already cast his votes, the new ones sit around uselessly? If he's not casting votes, how does his opponent use PS? Ick. >>>>Bleed action is clear. >>>>Political Action is not - since the rulebook uses it for too many >things >>>>(the action and the referendum). >> >>>What would you call the political analogue to a bleed action? >> a bleed is instantaneous, a referendum is not. >>in that there is not analog. >A bleed action refers to the runup. What refers to the runup for a vote? >Political Action refers to the runup. Unfortunately, it also refers to >the Referendum. >If it does not (as you seem to propose), then you can only play: >Bewitching Oration, Surprise Influence, Dread Gaze, Business Pressure, >Disarming Presence, Elder Kindred Network, etc. *before* terms are set (during >the runup - the Political Action part). >And some of these cards become redundant (Only during a Political Action >before Votes are cast is redundant if Political Action doesn't refer to the >Referendum). Actions refer to the entire sequence. The vote, and the aftermath, are all part of the political action. >If the DT had been more clear, and used the term Referndum, then this >conversation would not be necessary. Except "political action" always can refer the the whole shebang, and vote only to the sitting around in the Camarilla part. Replace "political action" with "vote action" and the whole things becomes clear. The DT put on the business about "political action" sometimes only referring to the vote, but that is not in the rules nor the cards. >To use "Bleed" for both the action runup and the action resolution creates >no problems because the action resolution is instantaneous. >The two are not the same animal. Note the restriction on action modifiers: "The same action modifier card cannot be used twice by the same minion *during* the same action". There's similar wording for reactions. So clearly action refers to the runup. The phrase "vote" is used in the list of possible actions - but that's perfectly reasonable as all of the listed actions describe the result of the action - e.g. "bleed", not "bleed action". Cryptic Rider does say "only usable after a political action is successful" and we all agree with the interpretation that that requires that the vote succeed, not just be called. But that's entirely consistent with other actions - an unblocked bleed for 0 is also considered unsuccessful. If you look at the cards, every card that mentions political action is consistent with the interpretation that political action is just like any other kind of action and includes the runup phase. OTOH, Natasha's special ability and the "call a vote to burn" cards both imply that "political action" refers to more than the voting phase. So political actions are exactly analogous to other actions: Equip actions cause equiping. Bleed actions cause bleeds. Political actions cause votes. and "political action" includes the runup. Curt Adams (curt...@aol.com)

L. Scott Johnson

curt...@aol.com (CurtAdams) writes: >lsc...@crl.com (L. Scott Johnson) [deleted] [ quoted text not captured ] [deleted] >Cryptic Rider does say "only usable after a political action is >successful" and we all agree with the interpretation that that requires >that the vote succeed, not just be called. But that's entirely consistent >with other actions - an unblocked bleed for 0 is also considered >unsuccessful. An unsuccessful Bleed, yes. But it is still a successful action (for purposes of Freak Drive, etc.) - you just don't get the Edge. >If you look at the cards, every card that mentions political action is >consistent with the interpretation that political action is just like any >other kind of action and includes the runup phase. OTOH, Natasha's >special ability and the "call a vote to burn" cards both imply that >"political action" refers to more than the voting phase. >So political actions are exactly analogous to other actions: >Equip actions cause equiping. >Bleed actions cause bleeds. >Political actions cause votes. >and "political action" includes the runup. Unfortunately the DT does not agree with you. Cards that can be played "Only During a Political Action" can only be played during the Referendum, not the runup. -- L. Scott Johnson (sjoh...@math.scarolina.edu) | These opinions are mine and Graphics Specialist and Jyhad Rulemonger. | are subject to card text.

Marko Puumalainen

sjoh...@math.scarolina.edu (L. Scott Johnson) writes: Peace Scott, >>with other actions - an unblocked bleed for 0 is also considered >>unsuccessful. >An unsuccessful Bleed, yes. But it is still a successful action (for >purposes of Freak Drive, etc.) - you just don't get the Edge. So bleed is an action. How can it be successful and unsuccessful at the same time? An unsuccessful bleed is also a successful action? This could only be the case if you interpret all unblocked actions to be successful. In zero bleed to your prey your minion was successful in "taking the action" but the action itself did not fullfil any requirements for successful action (pool reduction, edge). I hope this never becomes an official ruling that 0 bleed is a succesful action. Too much confusion, as if Rotschreck is not enough. ))marko -- I would give my right arm to be ambidextrous.

L. Scott Johnson

ma...@beta.hut.fi (Marko Puumalainen) writes: >sjoh...@math.scarolina.edu (L. Scott Johnson) writes: >Peace Scott, >>>with other actions - an unblocked bleed for 0 is also considered >>>unsuccessful. >>An unsuccessful Bleed, yes. But it is still a successful action (for >>purposes of Freak Drive, etc.) - you just don't get the Edge. >So bleed is an action. How can it be successful and unsuccessful at >the same time? An unsuccessful bleed is also a successful action? This The same way that you can have a failed vote after successfully calling the vote. >could only be the case if you interpret all unblocked actions to be >successful. In zero bleed to your prey your minion was successful in All unblocked actions *are* successful, for purposes of Freak Drive. The bleed (of zero) is not successful for purposes of the Edge. A failed vote is not successful for purposes of Cryptic Rider. >"taking the action" but the action itself did not fullfil any >requirements for successful action (pool reduction, edge). >I hope this never becomes an official ruling that 0 bleed is a >succesful action. Too much confusion, as if Rotschreck is not enough. It is official, and fairly intuitive. [14]: "If unblocked, the minion's action is successful." [ quoted text not captured ]

James R. McClure Jr.

ma...@beta.hut.fi (Marko Puumalainen) wrote: > >Peace Scott, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ THIEF!! 8^) Nil carborundum illigitimi, James R. McClure Jr. The OS/2 Apostle <insert disclaimer here>