In message <5f9g239vd5dfde7dh...@4ax.com>, Morgan Vening
<mor...@optusnet.com.au> writes:
>On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:30:44 -0400, The Lasombra
><TheLa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>Now I'm guessing what happens next is that I show (but not *play*,
>>>i.e. keep in my hand and remain at my current hand size) an equipment
>>>or retainer card to all other players and declare that this is the
>>>card that Jack of Both Sides is targeting?
>>
>>You cannot show the card.
>>
>>http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/index.php?line=veknRules
>>
>>4.4. Card Elevation and Disposition
>>
>>Players must keep their cards above the level of the playing surface.
>>Revealing cards in your hand or uncontrolled area to any opponent is
>>not allowed.
>
>What's the penalty associated with this? We have one specific player
>who when questioned, will show his hand or a specific card, to prove a
>point.
In order to enforce discipline and eschew disorder, the official
recommendations for this are, in ascending order of seriousness:
- satanic-blood orgy
- exile
- death
- disqualification.
More helpfully, in a judging situation, you have to decide whether the
player was intentionally breaking the rules or not. Do they know the
behavior is illegal?
If it's an unintentional oversight, it falls most closely (IMO) to
Procedural Error - Minor. "(C) A player repeatedly holds her cards
below the table" seems pretty close. The penalty is a caution.
Essentially, the player just gets told not to do it again, though the
judge bears it in mind later.
If it's intentional, or repeated (and since the player has been told
about it, it's probably intentional then!), you'd need to upgrade the
penalty. I'd be wary about going beyond a Warning.
Correcting the game state... some people would just leave it as it is
which provides a small amount of information to the table. Others would
make the player discard the card, or shuffle it back into their library,
or similar. If always done by a given judge, this might leave you with
a situation where a player could use it as a "free" discard in a crunch
spot, which wouldn't be great. However, it's a very simple resolution.
<
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad/msg/fbe8fd
987393a831> is an interesting thread. It starts from the assumption
that the showing is unintentional/not cheating, but restoration of game
state would be similar in both cases.
Following some objections to judges meddling with people's hands, I make
a suggestion in <
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.trading-
cards.jyhad/msg/f9eea9c6546ff365> where - if it matters to a current
situation, such as seeing a Delaying Tactics during a vote - you could
give a Methuselah a random decision which is hidden from the table
temporarily, to restore doubt and uncertainty to a situation. Some
people might like it, some people might not.
--
James Coupe
PGP Key: 0x5D623D5D YOU ARE IN ERROR.
EBD690ECD7A1FB457CA2 NO-ONE IS SCREAMING.
13D7E668C3695D623D5D THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION.