Hi,
Suppose Conrad Adoula plays an action card.
A tapped younger vampire with superior Maleficia would like to cancel
it as played, using Evil Eye.
a- How much blood would that younger vampire spend to play that card?
(the answer should be 1 or 2)
Evil Eye does state that the _acting_ minion is tapped.
b- Does that mean there is an acting minion?
If it does, I expect Conrad Adoula to be the acting minion, and since
Conrad is acting and the other vampire, younger than acting Conrad, is
playing a reaction card, that reaction card should cost him 1
additional blood.
Pending question :
c- If there is an acting minion, shouldn't there be an action around?
Thanks
~~
Conrad Adoula
Cardtype: Vampire
Clan: Lasombra
Group: 4
Capacity: 8
Discipline: ani cel DOM OBT POT
Sabbat: While Conrad is acting, reaction cards cost younger vampires
an additional blood.
Evil Eye
Cardtype: Combat/Reaction
Clan:
Cost: 1 blood
Discipline: Maleficia
Burn Option
Do not replace until your untap phase.
[mal] [COMBAT] Cancel a strike card played by the opposing minion as
it is played (no cost is paid). The opposing minion cannot choose
another strike and gets no strike instead. [mal] is not a Discipline.
[MAL] [REACTION] Cancel an action card as it is played and tap the
acting minion.
On 3 mai, 00:07, floppyzedolfin <floppyzedol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A tapped younger vampire with superior Maleficia would like to cancel
> it as played, using Evil Eye.
Err. The reacting vampire isn't tapped. And the reaction card played
isn't "Wake" as the title seems to show, but Evil Eye.
On May 2, 6:07 pm, floppyzedolfin <floppyzedol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Suppose Conrad Adoula plays an action card.
>> [An untapped] younger vampire with superior Maleficia would like to cancel> it as played, using Evil Eye.
>
> a- How much blood would that younger vampire spend to play that card?
> (the answer should be 1 or 2)
2 blood.
> Evil Eye does state that the _acting_ minion is tapped.
> b- Does that mean there is an acting minion?
There is an acting minion. Evil Eye doesn't make this true, however.
The action card (or rather, the announcing of the action) makes it
true.
> If it does, I expect Conrad Adoula to be the acting minion, and since
> Conrad is acting and the other vampire, younger than acting Conrad, is
> playing a reaction card, that reaction card should cost him 1
> additional blood.
Correct all around. Card text.
> Pending question :
> c- If there is an acting minion, shouldn't there be an action around?
There should be, yes. Except that it (the action card) gets canceled
as it is played. So the action that should have been ... isn't.
Card text.
[ quoted text not captured ]