rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

LSJ: Masika as a malk in the network?

4 messages from 4 participants · 30 June 1998
original thread on Google Groups

Philippe Richer

I was just wondering if it were possible to be this devilish, or if someone somewhere will sometime whack me on the head with the rules and errata and say it's illegal. Let's say I'm playing a Malk deck, with Masika included for a strange combo. I first influence Masika, then on the next turn make a Malk out of him thanks to Clan Impersonation. Since I have the Madness Network in play, can he bleed my prey after each players' turns, or does he get caught in the No Repeat Action rule? Does the No Repeat Action rule apply for the full turn around the table? Or does it apply only for each player's turn? And if it's the second option, does the end of another player's turn put Masika's No Repeat Action flag back to rest? As asked up there, can he continuously untap and bleed through the Madness Network? I don't know if it's been discussed before, but I haven't found anything on the subject yet. Bleu <legrand "at" generation "dot" net>

Karl and Sam

Philippe Richer wrote: [ quoted text not captured ] No Problem I should think, since no repeat actions states.... > Repeat Action rule: No single minion can repeat an action in a turn. This refers to the > particular action type. For example, a vampire which successfully bleeds its prey via > Computer Hacking, then untaps via Freak Drive, cannot perform any bleeding action > again whatsoever that turn, regardless of whether or not it is a Computer Hacking action. > Since the rule applys to repeat actions in a turn and Masika untaps only between turns by card text you never end up breaking the rule. In fact I have an interesting Masika/Madness Vote deck nicknamed "whose turn is it anyway", hard to pull off but when it works..... Karl

LSJ

leg...@nospam.generation.net (Philippe Richer) wrote: > [Masika - Clan Impersonation - Madness Network combo clipped] > Does the No Repeat Action rule apply for the full turn around the table? Or > does it apply only for each player's turn? The latter. > And if it's the second option, does > the end of another player's turn put Masika's No Repeat Action flag back to > rest? As asked up there, can he continuously untap and bleed through the > Madness Network? Once each turn, yes. -- L. Scott Johnson (vte...@wizards.com) VTES Net.Rep for Wizards of the Coast. Searchable database of official card text, errata, and rulings: http://deckserver.net/cgi-deckserver/rulemonger.cgi/powersearch -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum

daniel frey

Philippe Richer wrote: > > I was just wondering if it were possible to be this devilish, or if someone > somewhere will sometime whack me on the head with the rules and errata and say > it's illegal. > > Let's say I'm playing a Malk deck, with Masika included for a strange combo. I > first influence Masika, then on the next turn make a Malk out of him thanks to > Clan Impersonation. Since I have the Madness Network in play, can he bleed my > prey after each players' turns, or does he get caught in the No Repeat Action > rule? > Does the No Repeat Action rule apply for the full turn around the table? Or > does it apply only for each player's turn? And if it's the second option, does > the end of another player's turn put Masika's No Repeat Action flag back to > rest? As asked up there, can he continuously untap and bleed through the > Madness Network? > > I don't know if it's been discussed before, but I haven't found anything on > the subject yet. It is a very fun deck if you can get everything in place. It actually has to be a very high defense deck, because everyone will see Masika as a threat, and try and kill him, or take out the Madness Net. But, the deck really begins to rock if you can slap a couple Aching Beautys on Masika before he begins his march. Then there is almost no stopping the fun (except for someone inevitably beating the hell out of Masika). I've actually played this deck in tournament; it was really defensive and slow starting and it almost always lost to the two-hour time limit (once when I was on the verge of a sweep). I lost once to my predator pulling a hostile takeover on Masika, and somehow using him to kill the rest of the table, followed by me.